I do (It's taken from the Qmail spam control patch)
(http://www.fehcom.de/qmail/qmail_en.html)
There's a lot of good stuff in there. We found in practice that
real-time blackhole list was a pain in the *** for high-volume systems
due to the lookup time, so we used the Spam control patch instead)
PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2002 4:34
To: 'James Developers List'
Subject: RE: Anti-SPAMMER measures
I do (It's taken from the Qmail spam control patch)
(http://www.fehcom.de/qmail/qmail_en.html)
There's a lot of good stuff in there. We found in practice that
real-time blackhole list
Comments in the body...
-Original Message-
From: Noel J. Bergman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 21 August 2002 16:48
To: James Developers List
Subject: RE: Anti-SPAMMER measures
Jason,
Thanks. I think I see a way to patch James to be less
SPAMMer friendly
