Jason,
James does need well formed addresses, including incoming ones, to route mail with,
and the standards are quite clear about what is and isnt acceptable.
I expect we could accept a wider variety than we do, but why would we?
Mail is pretty much wholly dependant on people following the
-Original Message-
From: Danny Angus [mailto:danny;apache.org]
Sent: 22 October 2002 12:15
To: James Developers List
Subject: RE: SMTP Handler
Jason,
James does need well formed addresses, including incoming
ones, to route mail with, and the standards are quite clear
-Original Message-
From: Jason Webb [mailto:jw;inovem.com]
I've noticed in the past (and at the moment) that James is very fussy
about SMTP syntax for email addresses (MAIL TO etc). Although this is
not a significant problem, Qmail has a much better outlook on life:
Jason, Can you
I've noticed in the past (and at the moment) that James is very fussy
about SMTP syntax for email addresses (MAIL TO etc).
Can you possibly make a list of acceptable but malformed addresses
that James should accept but does not.
There are existing sources of really weird address forms that
