Re: [PATCH 15/19] x86-64: move received parameters to non-fixed registers

2009-09-06 Thread Tomek Grabiec
Hi, 2009/9/5 Eduard - Gabriel Munteanu : > We must not keep the parameters we received in fixed registers because > they can be clobbered by other insn-selector rules that use them (e.g. > method invocation). > > Signed-off-by: Eduard - Gabriel Munteanu > --- >  arch/x86/insn-selector.brg     |  

Re: [PATCH 15/19] x86-64: move received parameters to non-fixed registers

2009-09-06 Thread Pekka Enberg
On Sat, 2009-09-05 at 13:27 +0300, Eduard - Gabriel Munteanu wrote: > We must not keep the parameters we received in fixed registers because > they can be clobbered by other insn-selector rules that use them (e.g. > method invocation). > > Signed-off-by: Eduard - Gabriel Munteanu I applied this

[PATCH 15/19] x86-64: move received parameters to non-fixed registers

2009-09-05 Thread Eduard - Gabriel Munteanu
We must not keep the parameters we received in fixed registers because they can be clobbered by other insn-selector rules that use them (e.g. method invocation). Signed-off-by: Eduard - Gabriel Munteanu --- arch/x86/insn-selector.brg | 38 +++--- include/jit