On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 4:43 PM, Andreas Veithen
wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 11:02 PM, Ruchith Fernando
> wrote:
>> Hi Andreas,
>>
>> Sorry ... my commit message is wrong!
>>
>> What I wanted to say was that I'm excluding them for now *until* those
>> are updated to use the policy based confi
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 11:02 PM, Ruchith Fernando
wrote:
> Hi Andreas,
>
> Sorry ... my commit message is wrong!
>
> What I wanted to say was that I'm excluding them for now *until* those
> are updated to use the policy based configuration.
>
> I was planning to work on this as and when I find tim
Hi Andreas,
Sorry ... my commit message is wrong!
What I wanted to say was that I'm excluding them for now *until* those
are updated to use the policy based configuration.
I was planning to work on this as and when I find time, and make sure
all those excluded test cases will be working again (h
Ruchith,
I'm in favor of eliminating the basic configuration. However, as you
have noticed, there were test cases using that configuration. From
what I see they not only test the configuration mechanism as such, but
also the underlying features. You simply removed them with the
following commit co
+1
Thanks !
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 7:12 PM, Ruchith Fernando
wrote:
> Hi Devs,
>
> Is anyone opposed to removing the deprecated (since rampart-1.1) basic
> configuration and just have one mode of configuration in Rampart?
>
> Thanks,
> Ruchith
>
> ---
