RE: SHA2 support

Hi, Can anybody reply me? Is SHA256 really supported? Leos Od: Leos Literak [mailto:[email protected]] Odesláno: 15. března 2011 8:48 Komu: [email protected] Předmět: RE: SHA2 support Hello, Is there anybody out there who has ever used the SHA256 algorithm / know

[jira] Created: (AXIS2-4981) Axis2 + Rampart X.509 + JAXB = Namespace URIs and local names to the unmarshaller needs to be interned.

Axis2 + Rampart X.509 + JAXB = Namespace URIs and local names to the unmarshaller needs to be interned. --- Key: AXIS2-4981 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/bro

[jira] Updated: (TRANSPORTS-1) JMSSender executes unnecessary JNDI lookups

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRANSPORTS-1?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Hiranya Jayathilaka updated TRANSPORTS-1: - Attachment: TRANSPORTS-1-update1.patch Making a minor improvement to my earlier

[jira] Updated: (AXIS2-4981) Axis2 + Rampart X.509 + JAXB = Namespace URIs and local names to the unmarshaller needs to be interned.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS2-4981?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Rustam Abdullaev updated AXIS2-4981: Description: When Axis2 is used with JAXB bindings and unencrypted SOAP body, all goes well

[jira] Created: (TRANSPORTS-34) Support More Compact EPRs in JMS Transport

Support More Compact EPRs in JMS Transport -- Key: TRANSPORTS-34 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRANSPORTS-34 Project: Axis2 Transports Issue Type: Improvement Components: JMS

[jira] Updated: (TRANSPORTS-34) Support More Compact EPRs in JMS Transport

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRANSPORTS-34?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Hiranya Jayathilaka updated TRANSPORTS-34: -- Attachment: TRANSPORTS-34.patch Attaching a simple patch to implement this f

[jira] Commented: (AXIS2-3851) adb-codegen no longer accepts schemas without targetNamespace

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS2-3851?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13007909#comment-13007909 ] Rustam Abdullaev commented on AXIS2-3851: - Someone please reopen this issue. Why

[jira] Created: (AXIS2-4982) Axis2 (+ XMLBeans) cannot properly handle C-style comments inside tag

Axis2 (+ XMLBeans) cannot properly handle C-style comments inside tag - Key: AXIS2-4982 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS2-4982 Project: Axis2

[AXIS2] Session Management in Modules

Hi, I need your help in the following scenario to implement. I have a client program Client.java that want to invoke a method say invokeMe() of serviceA. I want to intercept the invoking messages coming to serviceA and do some negotiation between the client and serviceA before invoking method i

[jira] Commented: (AXIS2-3851) adb-codegen no longer accepts schemas without targetNamespace

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS2-3851?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13008090#comment-13008090 ] Andreas Veithen commented on AXIS2-3851: In the "Subversion Commits" tab you can s

Jenkins build became unstable: Axis2 » Apache Axis2 - Integration #682

See - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Jenkins build became unstable: Axis2 #682

See - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Jenkins build is back to stable : Axis2 » Apache Axis2 - Integration #683

See - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Jenkins build is back to stable : Axis2 #683

See - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Re: [Axis2] Isn't it time for us to move to Java 6?

We need to take into account the interest of the entire user community, not just particular customers of particular companies selling particular services. In addition, dropping support for Java 1.5 is not going to change things fundamentally for these customers/companies: * We already have develop

Re: [Axis2] Isn't it time for us to move to Java 6?

I agree with Andreas, we've seen issues related with core features but a very few (significantly less issues) related with java version. I have no objection and really encourage testing java6, but do not think we should completely move to java6 (unless we gain something significantly). Deepal > W

Jenkins build became unstable: Rampart » Rampart - Integration #334

See - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Jenkins build became unstable: Rampart #334

See - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Re: [Axis2] Isn't it time for us to move to Java 6?

On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 2:40 AM, Andreas Veithen wrote: > We need to take into account the interest of the entire user > community, not just particular customers of particular companies > selling particular services. In addition, dropping support for Java > 1.5 is not going to change things fundam