On Monday 30 May 2005 02:44, Erik Hatcher wrote:
> I concur with Daniel on this. For the moment, my preference is to
> bring in Paul's parser into contrib/surround and let it gain some
> additional exposure there. I don't believe its possible or even
> preferable to attempt to build one que
On Friday 03 June 2005 21:31, Doug Cutting wrote:
> Then maybe a sentence explaining how the file lengths are computed could
> be added instead?
Like this?: "FileData --> raw file data - the entries' length isn't
explicitly specified but can be calculated by taking the difference of
two consecu