On Monday 06 June 2005 18:23, Bernhard Messer wrote:
> i would suggest to remove the deprecated flags from methods
> "getCurrentVersion()" and "lastModified()".
Okay, I just did that and rephrased the javadoc so that lastModified should
not be used to check whether a reader is up-to-date.
Regar
Hi,
the FAQ contains this sentence:
"Document that are deleted really are in deleted (???)"
What is that supposed to mean? Could someone rephrase it?
Regards
Daniel
--
http://www.danielnaber.de
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EM
On Tue, 07 Jun 2005 09:13:10 +0200, Bernhard Messer wrote:
> exactly, that's what i had in mind. I know that we have to allocate a
> new string object for every call, but this must be much cheaper than the
> current implementation which has to walk thru the whole array every time
> the method is
Bernhard Messer wrote:
sorry for the confusion. On the first look, i thought the new class
IndexFileNames, containing the necessary constant values, fits perfect
into org.apache.lucene.index. After a more detailed look, i get the
feeling that it would be much better to place the new class into
Bernhard Messer wrote:
Doug Cutting wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
---
lucene/java/trunk/src/java/org/apache/lucene/store/FSDirectory.java
(original)
+++
lucene/java/trunk/src/java/org/apache/lucene/store/FSDirectory.java
Mon Jun 6 10:52:12 2005
@@ -52,8 +52,8 @@
if (name.ends
Doug Cutting wrote:
Bernhard Messer wrote:
Therefore i would like to propose two changes:
1) we should store the extension in a hash and not in String[] to
have a faster lookup
Do you mean to use something like:
String lastDot = name.lastIndexOf('.');
if (lastDot >= 0) {
String nameExt
