DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36219] New: - [PATCH] Submissiom form simple Romanian Analyzer

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36219] - [PATCH] Submissiom form simple Romanian Analyzer

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36219] - [PATCH] Submissiom form simple Romanian Analyzer

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36219] - [PATCH] Submissiom form simple Romanian Analyzer

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36219] - [PATCH] Submissiom form simple Romanian Analyzer

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36219] - [PATCH] Submissiom form simple Romanian Analyzer

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36219] - [PATCH] Submissiom form simple Romanian Analyzer

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36219] - [PATCH] Submissiom form simple Romanian Analyzer

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36219] - [PATCH] Submissiom form simple Romanian Analyzer

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36219] - [PATCH] Submissiom form simple Romanian Analyzer

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

lucene API

Hi there, I am creating a search solution based on Lucene. A part of the solution is Lucene web service. Even though the Lucene API is very straitforward to use on a local machine, I found creation of Lucene WS to be extremely difficult. The problem causes the API, which very often d

RE: lucene API

I think you should leave the API as is, and write a custom XML writer for lucene search results. The request is trivial since you can simple pass the single string. I would not write wrapper beans just to use the built-in serialization support. The custom XML writer will be MUCH, MUCH faster, as y

Re: lucene API

On Wednesday 17 August 2005 15:26, Maros Ivanco wrote: > I would personally prefer the third one, but only if the changes will > make it to the official release. Whether a patch is accepted can obviously only be decided when we see the patch, so no promises can be made. Regards Daniel -- htt

[ANN] Lucene "Did You Mean" article on java.net

In case subscribers to this list missed it, my article on how to add a "did you mean" facility to Lucene searches was published last week: http://today.java.net/pub/a/today/2005/08/09/didyoumean.html. Regards, Tom - To unsubscri

Re: [ANN] Lucene "Did You Mean" article on java.net

Great article, Tom! Thanks - I had meant to post it to the list myself. You ought to post it on [EMAIL PROTECTED] as well, as most folks are there instead of here. Erik On Aug 17, 2005, at 5:58 PM, Tom White wrote: In case subscribers to this list missed it, my article on how to ad

Re: lucene API

When I first started digging into the Lucene codebase, I felt similarly - the coding convention rule breaking drove me nuts. Lucene grew on me and I've changed my take on "conventions" dramatically thanks to Doug's explanations and the flavor he has imparted onto the codebase. His "conven