DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35823] - [PATCH] BooleanScorer2 ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException + alternative NearSpans

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35823] - [PATCH] BooleanScorer2 ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: lucene API

On Aug 18, 2005, at 1:09 PM, Maros Ivanco wrote: To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org From: Erik Hatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: 18.08.2005 3:45 Subject: Re: lucene API When I first started digging into the Lucene codebase, I felt similarly - the coding convention rule breaking drove me nuts. Lucen

Re: lucene API

-Erik Hatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: - >To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org >From: Erik Hatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Date: 18.08.2005 3:45 >Subject: Re: lucene API > >When I first started digging into the Lucene codebase, I felt >similarly - the coding convention rule breaking drove me nu

RE: lucene API

Sorry, but I don't think you have a clear understanding of web services. In order to design a really useful WebService it is almost always best to create a web service API that is drastically different (usually much simpler) than the underlying systems API. Think of the web service interface to m

Re: lucene API

Sure. I have noticed that Lucene uses certain programming style which is not usual. I believe, that there are some reasons for this style, so I would like to discuss the reasons with the author(s) first, rather than blindly add g/setters, remove final keywords, add empty constructors, create facto

RE: lucene API

-"Robert Engels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: - >To: >From: "Robert Engels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Date: 17.08.2005 16:20 >Subject: RE: lucene API > >I think you should leave the API as is, and write a custom XML writer >for >lucene search results. The request is trivial since you can simple

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36242] - Creating a new index vs. opening an existing one

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36101] - [PATCH] Contribution: Did you mean...

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36242] New: - Creating a new index vs. opening an existing one

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36241] New: - "Cannot rename segments.new to segments"

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [ANN] Lucene "Did You Mean" article on java.net

Thanks Erik. I've just posted the announcement to the java-user list. Tom On 8/18/05, Erik Hatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Great article, Tom! Thanks - I had meant to post it to the list > myself. You ought to post it on [EMAIL PROTECTED] as well, as most > folks are there instead of here