Ah I see it. Should we start assigning and voting for issues that
should make it into the 1.9 release? Maybe set a due date for
submitting these 1.9-bound issues, a week for voting and review, and
then allocate time for applying the patches. I can't wait to see an
officially released 1.9!
Also,
-- Forwarded message --
From: Ray Tsang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Oct 15, 2005 11:06 AM
Subject: Re: Lucene 1.9 release date?
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Can we add a 1.9 release to the roadmap? or start a 1.9 release tracker issue?
ray,
On 10/15/05, Erik Hatcher <[EMAIL PRO
Sorry, I guess I point out a wrong java class name.
I want to be confirmed that if SegmentMerger.java in
Lucene do dedup or not. I tracing down couple of java
class from SegmentMerger.java, such as,
SegmentReader.java, IndexWriter.java,
SegmentReader.java. I didn't see a dedup mechanism
yet.
than
Sorry, I've only briefly looked at Nutch, so you should ask on that mailing
list.
Lucene doesn't do deduping.
-Yonik
Now hiring -- http://tinyurl.com/7m67g
On 10/14/05, Michael Ji <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> hi Yonik:
>
> Does that mean when two documents has same MD5 content
> in two differe
hi Yonik:
Does that mean when two documents has same MD5 content
in two different segments, IndexMerger.java will keep
both of them?
When I look at the code of IndexSegment.java, it
handle MD5 dedupling by keeping the one with higher
document ID.
So, when refetching happens, the old segment sho
There is no concept in Lucene of document identity linked to any fields of a
document.
You need to handle removal of duplicates yourself.
-Yonik
Now hiring -- http://tinyurl.com/7m67g
On 10/14/05, Michael Ji <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> hi,
>
> When Nutch's IndexMerger.java is called, the inde
hi,
When Nutch's IndexMerger.java is called, the indexes
from multiple segment directories are merged to one
target directory.
I wonder how lucene deals with the case when identical
documents existing in two segments. Is the older
document ( lower time stamp ) deleted?
thanks,
Michael Ji,
I think this is for [EMAIL PROTECTED] please remove java-dev@ when
replying.
--- Michael Ji <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hi,
>
> I saw several discussions about Distributed Link
> Analysis Tool before. And I still have question about
> the usage of the field "next score" in Page data
> structure
FieldsReader does not regard offset and position flags
--
Key: LUCENE-455
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-455
Project: Lucene - Java
Type: Bug
Components: Index
Versions: 1.9
Reporte
hi,
I saw several discussions about Distributed Link
Analysis Tool before. And I still have question about
the usage of the field "next score" in Page data
structure.
Seems Distributed Link Analysis Tool will update this
field by OutlinkWithTarget ( as I understand, that
means the link has target
10 matches
Mail list logo
