If you do not put them in Lucene, performing any sort of AND search will be
VERY difficult, and/or VERY slow.
-Original Message-
From: Mario Alejandro M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2005 4:08 PM
To: Lucene Developers List
Subject: Put field in database vs. Lucen
I have a requeriment in mix structured and un-structured data. Also, the
non-structured data have meta-data.
If I have:
Id
Title
Author
Content
DateCreated
DateAccesed
And a lot od schemes like that... so I put all fields less Content in a
database or in lucene?
--
Mario Alejandro Montoya
MCP
w
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-350?page=all ]
Daniel Naber resolved LUCENE-350:
-
Fix Version: unspecified
Resolution: Fixed
Assign To: (was: Lucene Developers)
Both name counter and segment counter are now document at
I'm reading now
http://research.nitle.org/lsi/lsa_explanation.htm
How much valuable is it?
I'm looking for a way to lower the "noise" in searching (the infamous "lucky
bug, get 100.000 hits!") and improve accuracy. I plan to build a search
engine for the enterprise so I don't can count in a lot
On Wednesday 02 November 2005 12:47, Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
> Hello,
>
> --- Paul Elschot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
>
> > It's possible to share segments between indexes when the file system
> > allows files to be present in multiple directories.
>
> Oh, are you saying that I could just le
There only need to be sorted if segA and segB were combined so in your case,
this is not needed.
I am not sure that what you are describing is any different than how
MultiReader works, and it does not need to perform any file copying of
linking.
Just create the new index. Write the documents. And
> This sounds like it should be possible, except for docId clashes - if
> index A had a document with Id 100 and index B also has a document with
> Id 100, after my index file copying, index C will end up having 2
> documents with Id 100, and that won't work. So, documents in C would
> have to be
Hello,
--- Paul Elschot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 01 November 2005 08:51, Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I spent most of today talking to some people about Lucene, and one
> of
> > them said how they would really like to have an "instantaneous
> index
> > merge", and ho
Hello,
--- Robert Engels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Problem is the terms need to be sorted in a single segment.
Are you referring to Term Dictionary (.tis and .tii files as described
at http://lucene.apache.org/java/docs/fileformats.html )? If so, is
that really true?
I don't have an optimiz
