Hi All,
I think this release issue died out again. I noticed an increase in
commit activities recently! I've also noticed the release plan for
2.0 on the wiki. Does current 1.9 already meet the criterias for 2.0?
At least API-wise? If so, is it possible to make ways for a release?
at least mar
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-324?page=all ]
Erik Hatcher closed LUCENE-324:
---
Assign To: (was: Erik Hatcher)
> org.apache.lucene.analysis.cn.ChineseTokenizer missing offset decrement
> --
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-324?page=all ]
Erik Hatcher resolved LUCENE-324:
-
Fix Version: 1.9
Resolution: Fixed
Assign To: Erik Hatcher (was: Lucene Developers)
Ray - 谢谢你 (let's see if JIRA can handle Chinese :) Sorr
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-473?page=all ]
Erik Hatcher closed LUCENE-473:
---
Fix Version: 1.9
Resolution: Duplicate
> Fix to let Searcher.close() and other methods accessible from c++ code
> --
On Sunday 04 December 2005 22:32, markharw00d wrote:
> I think I'm with Erik on this - I generally don't see end users keen to
> type anything other than "words with spaces" as queries.
I think/hope that XSL allows a simplified front end that would fit
my needs.
> I do see them commonly using G
I think I'm with Erik on this - I generally don't see end users keen to
type anything other than "words with spaces" as queries.
I do see them commonly using GUI forms with multiple inputs and behind
the scenes application code assembling the query - the same way just
about every web app in the
On Dec 4, 2005, at 11:02 AM, Paul Elschot wrote:
Are there XML editors that can limit their output to a given
stylesheet?
In that case one only needs to predefine a style sheet for queries.
Yes, there are many sophisticated XML editors. I'm not quite sure
where you're going with this thou
Following up on the (Span)RegexQuery topic, I've started working on
moving this code to contrib/regex so that it can leverage various
regex implementations. I'm making a generic interface that currently
(though subject to change) has these methods:
void compile(String pattern);
boolean
On Sunday 04 December 2005 15:26, Erik Hatcher wrote:
>
> On Dec 4, 2005, at 6:52 AM, Paul Elschot wrote:
> > I tried rewroting the XML query in exactly this way, with a
> > few property=.. constructs:
> >
> > boostingQuery(
> > matchQuery=moreLikeThis(
> > percentTer
On Dec 4, 2005, at 6:52 AM, Paul Elschot wrote:
I tried rewroting the XML query in exactly this way, with a
few property=.. constructs:
boostingQuery(
matchQuery=moreLikeThis(
percentTermsToMatch="0.25",
docId="44",
On Sunday 04 December 2005 05:17, Yonik Seeley wrote:
> On 12/3/05, Paul Elschot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Indeed, this is a disadvantage of the "function call" syntax.
>
> It depends on the langage. Take Python for example:
>
> >>> def foo(a,b): print a,b
> >>> foo(1,2)
> 1 2
> >>> foo(a=1
Paul Elschot wrote:
Would it be possible to privide such a GUI automatically
(by introspection) given a set of Query classes of which objects
can be mixed to form a query?
Certainly possible - I've seen app servers with automatic GUI test
clients which can introspect an EJB interface and l
12 matches
Mail list logo