Re: Lucene 1.9 RC1 release available

2006-02-24 Thread Chris Hostetter
: FYI, I think all of the commits to trunk since the RC1 release are safe : to merge to the 1.9 branch. They're mostly documentation improvements. : So my plan is currently, on Monday, to merge these changes to the 1.9 : branch, then make a 1.9-final release. I'll again announce it to the ...

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-332) nightly build/javadocs for sandbox

2006-02-24 Thread Hoss Man (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-332?page=comments#action_12367747 ] Hoss Man commented on LUCENE-332: - This bug can probably be invalidated, 1.9 will be out real-soon-now, and the initial changes to include contrib code as seperate groups of t

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-499) Documentation improvements for 1.9 release

2006-02-24 Thread Hoss Man (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-499?page=all ] Hoss Man updated LUCENE-499: Attachment: LUCENE-499.patch Documentation patch that does all of the things I just said > Documentation improvements for 1.9 release > ---

[jira] Created: (LUCENE-499) Documentation improvements for 1.9 release

2006-02-24 Thread Hoss Man (JIRA)
Documentation improvements for 1.9 release -- Key: LUCENE-499 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-499 Project: Lucene - Java Type: Improvement Components: Examples, Index, QueryParser, Store, Website Versio

Re: Lucene 1.9 RC1 release available

2006-02-24 Thread Daniel Naber
On Freitag 24 Februar 2006 00:50, Doug Cutting wrote: > > Are these all modules that don't need external libs? > > So far as I know!  They built without me downloading anything extra. Lucli requires jline.jar which is also in SVN and can be distributed thanks to its very liberal license (jline.L

Re: Lucene 1.9 RC1 release available

2006-02-24 Thread Erik Hatcher
On Feb 23, 2006, at 6:33 PM, Daniel Naber wrote: BTW, lucli (the command line lucene searcher) builds fine, but the manifest in the jar doesn't specify the Main-Class so you cannot start it with java's -jar option. Could someone have a look at this (Erik?)? I don't understand how that ant task

Re: XML Query Parser - next steps

2006-02-24 Thread Doug Cutting
mark harwood wrote: We currently have an extensible parser with composable "builder" modules. These builders currently only have a role in life which involves parsing particular XML chunks and instantiating the related Query/Filter objects. While useful, my question is could they/should they do

XML Query Parser - next steps

2006-02-24 Thread mark harwood
Before I commit this stuff to contrib I wanted to sound out dev members on directions for this code. We currently have an extensible parser with composable "builder" modules. These builders currently only have a role in life which involves parsing particular XML chunks and instantiating the relate