[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-629) Performance improvement for merging stored, compressed fields

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-629?page=comments#action_12421770 ] Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-629: - Thanks Michael, very impressive results! It might take a little while to review the patch, but the goals and general app

Re: Gdata - Indexing feeds and entries

On 7/17/06, Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Simon, welcome back, hope your exams went well! Thanks for asking everything went very well. Especially the compiler I wrote beside SoC gave me a good preparation for the exam on that topic. Let me tell ya LR Parser can drive you mad having

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-629) Performance improvement for merging stored, compressed fields

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-629?page=all ] Michael Busch updated LUCENE-629: - Attachment: optimized_merge_compressed_fields.patch The patch file for this improvement (based on Lucene Rev. 419199) > Performance improvement for merging s

[jira] Created: (LUCENE-629) Performance improvement for merging stored, compressed fields

Performance improvement for merging stored, compressed fields - Key: LUCENE-629 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-629 Project: Lucene - Java Issue Type: Improvement

Re: Gdata - Indexing feeds and entries

Hi Simon, welcome back, hope your exams went well! On 7/15/06, Simon Willnauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: My first and main problem is pretty well know on this mailinglist, well I found lots of questions and suggestions via google but these discussions are quite a while ago. I was wondering if t

Re: [jira] Commented: (LUCENE-565) Supporting deleteDocuments in IndexWriter (Code and Performance Results Provided)

On 7/14/06, Ning Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If one is going to be able to support deleteByQuery, why not a full > IndexSearcher/IndexWriter combination? What do you mean by "a full combination"? An IndexReader/IndexWriter combination that can be used to do searches as well as just deletes

Re: Lucene for XML Not searching tag values

Hi I guess this is a kind of a question which should be asked on the user mailing list. But anyway If you use the code below you search just in a single field named "type". "Type" in your xml has a value "individual" but not value "New York". Aside from the sense of your approach you should use th

Lucene for XML Not searching tag values

Hi I'm using Lucene for searching tag values in XML. In the bellow valid xml when search for the string "individual" it's getting me the results but when I search for "New York" (which is a value of a sub-tag "city"), it is not giving me the result. And here is the code sample... XML file: