[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-584?page=comments#action_12432435 ]
paul.elschot commented on LUCENE-584:
-
> No performance changes as well.
It's good to hear that. As mentioned earlier, this is groundwork only.
Once an actual
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-619?page=comments#action_12432425 ]
Otis Gospodnetic commented on LUCENE-619:
-
Actually, the Jar here looks invalid:
http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-ibiblio-rsync-repository/org/apache/lucen
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-619?page=comments#action_12432390 ]
Jukka Zitting commented on LUCENE-619:
--
The jars seem to be in place now.
> Lucene 1.9.1 and 2.0.0 Maven 2 packages are incorrectly deployed
> ---
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-658?page=comments#action_12432389 ]
Jukka Zitting commented on LUCENE-658:
--
This seems to be a duplicate of LUCENE-551. The releases are available at:
http://www.ibiblio.org/maven2/org/apach
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-584?page=comments#action_12432378 ]
Eks Dev commented on LUCENE-584:
Hi Paul,
for me, this patch did not cause any incompatibility issues. All our tests
passed without noticing any difference to the
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-569?page=all ]
paul.elschot updated LUCENE-569:
Attachment: NearSpans20060903.patch
NearSpans20060903.patch combines the changes for the bug fix on the
following files against revision 439747 (today):
src/ja
