Re: ParallelMultiSearcher reimplementation

2006-11-03 Thread Otis Gospodnetic
Gus, I encourage you to submit your patch. Java 1.5 is allowed in many people's local Lucene repositories. :) I use PMS in a few high-traffic places and would like to see your improvements. Otis - Original Message From: Gus Holcomb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Sen

Re: ParallelMultiSearcher reimplementation

2006-11-03 Thread Doug Cutting
Chuck Williams wrote: Why would a thread pool be more controversial? Dynamically creating and garbaging threads has many downsides. The JVM already pools native threads, so mostly what's saved by thread pools is the allocation & initialization of new Thread instances. There are also downsid

Re: ParallelMultiSearcher reimplementation

2006-11-03 Thread Chuck Williams
Chris Hostetter wrote on 11/03/2006 09:40 AM: > : Is there any timeline for when Java 1.5 packages will be allowed? > > I don't think i'll incite too much rioting to say "no there is no > timeline" > .. I may incite some rioting by saying "my guess is 1.5 packages will be > supported when the patch

Re: Lucene nightly build failure

2006-11-03 Thread Yonik Seeley
On 11/3/06, Chris Hostetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: : Misconfigured IP address on the host that does the nightly builds : (prob due to the infra move) : I just corrected it. For posterity / future refernece, can you clarify: 1) what the host is/was? lucene.zones.apache.org 2) how you c

Re: site javadocs and resolved issue 678

2006-11-03 Thread Doug Cutting
Chris Hostetter wrote: I stumbled upon this the other day... http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/lucene/java/nightly/ ...i don't know which host it runs on, or whether commiting changes to the nightly.sh will automatically put them into effect (or if it needs checked out somewhere) These are

RE: ParallelMultiSearcher reimplementation

2006-11-03 Thread Chris Hostetter
: Is there any timeline for when Java 1.5 packages will be allowed? Since I'd rather not have someone wire my car to explode (a joke that's particulararly funny to people who know that i don't have a driver's lisence let alone a car) I'll refrain from commenting and just point to these threads...

Re: Lucene nightly build failure

2006-11-03 Thread Chris Hostetter
: Misconfigured IP address on the host that does the nightly builds : (prob due to the infra move) : I just corrected it. For posterity / future refernece, can you clarify: 1) what the host is/was? 2) how you corrected it? -Hoss ---

Re: site javadocs and resolved issue 678

2006-11-03 Thread Chris Hostetter
: So, the upshot of this is we should not update docs on the site until : there is a release? Still, I think it would be nice to have a trunk : version hosted somewhere (as has been echoed by others) on the site +1 it sounds like we need to revert the docs at http://lucene.apache.org/java/docs

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-706) Index File Format - Example for frequency file .frq is wrong

2006-11-03 Thread Doron Cohen (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-706?page=comments#action_12447049 ] Doron Cohen commented on LUCENE-706: Right, sorry, copied that hex data from an .frq of an index with a different example, where the frequencies were 1 in doc

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-706) Index File Format - Example for frequency file .frq is wrong

2006-11-03 Thread Steven Rowe (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-706?page=comments#action_12447044 ] Steven Rowe commented on LUCENE-706: Hex: 0D is NOT the same as decimal 15. 0Dh = 13d. 15d = 0Fh. > Index File Format - Example for frequency file .frq is wr

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-706) Index File Format - Example for frequency file .frq is wrong

2006-11-03 Thread Doron Cohen (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-706?page=comments#action_12447042 ] Doron Cohen commented on LUCENE-706: Right - 15 = 2 * 7 + 1--> doc 7 with freq 1 8 = 2 * (11 - 7) --> doc 11 with frequency > 1 3

Re: ParallelMultiSearcher reimplementation

2006-11-03 Thread Doug Cutting
Gus Holcomb wrote: We are currently using Lucene 1.9.1 at work. Using a profiler, I discovered that searching with a HitCollector in a ParallelMultiSearcher is single threaded. By extending ParallelMultiSearcher I was able to parallelize it without a problem (and without requiring a new lucene

Re: Lucene nightly build failure

2006-11-03 Thread Yonik Seeley
On 11/2/06, Chris Hostetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: So that's 2 days in a row that the nightly build has failed because of a connection timeout in TestRemoteSearchable .. the tests works locally (for me anyway Misconfigured IP address on the host that does the nightly builds (prob due to the

RE: ParallelMultiSearcher reimplementation

2006-11-03 Thread Gus Holcomb
Is there any timeline for when Java 1.5 packages will be allowed? Thanks, Gus Holcomb -Original Message- From: Chris Hostetter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2006 8:08 PM To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: ParallelMultiSearcher reimplementation Hi Gus,

[jira] Created: (LUCENE-707) Lucene Java Site docs

2006-11-03 Thread Grant Ingersoll (JIRA)
Lucene Java Site docs - Key: LUCENE-707 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-707 Project: Lucene - Java Issue Type: Improvement Components: Website Environment: N/A Reporter: Gra

Re: site javadocs and resolved issue 678

2006-11-03 Thread Grant Ingersoll
So, the upshot of this is we should not update docs on the site until there is a release? Still, I think it would be nice to have a trunk version hosted somewhere (as has been echoed by others) on the site that could contain the nightly build docs. I can setup the links in the docs if so

[jira] Assigned: (LUCENE-706) Index File Format - Example for frequency file .frq is wrong

2006-11-03 Thread Grant Ingersoll (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-706?page=all ] Grant Ingersoll reassigned LUCENE-706: -- Assignee: Grant Ingersoll (was: Doron Cohen) > Index File Format - Example for frequency file .frq is wrong > -

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-706) Index File Format - Example for frequency file .frq is wrong

2006-11-03 Thread Grant Ingersoll (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-706?page=comments#action_12446948 ] Grant Ingersoll commented on LUCENE-706: Just to double check the math: >From the Website: "DocDelta determines both the document number and the frequency.