[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-664?page=all ]
Grant Ingersoll resolved LUCENE-664.
Resolution: Fixed
Going to close this one out for now, as I think we have gotten past the initial
flurry of changes for the new docs.
> [PATCH] small
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-675?page=comments#action_12447348 ]
Grant Ingersoll commented on LUCENE-675:
To run, checkout contrib/benchmark and then apply the benchmark.patch in the
contrib/benchmark directory.
> Lucen
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-675?page=all ]
Grant Ingersoll updated LUCENE-675:
---
Attachment: benchmark.patch
Initial Benchmark code based on Andrzej original contribution plus some changes
by me to use the Reuters "standard" collectio
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-675?page=comments#action_12447346 ]
Grant Ingersoll commented on LUCENE-675:
OK, here is a first crack at a standard benchmark contribution based on Andrzej
original contribution and some upd
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-706?page=all ]
Grant Ingersoll resolved LUCENE-706.
Resolution: Fixed
Applied. Thanks Johan and Doron.
> Index File Format - Example for frequency file .frq is wrong
> --
Doug Cutting wrote on 11/03/2006 12:18 PM:
> Chuck Williams wrote:
>> Why would a thread pool be more controversial? Dynamically creating and
>> garbaging threads has many downsides.
>
> The JVM already pools native threads, so mostly what's saved by thread
> pools is the allocation & initializati