[jira] Resolved: (LUCENE-664) [PATCH] small fixes to the new scoring.html doc

2006-11-05 Thread Grant Ingersoll (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-664?page=all ] Grant Ingersoll resolved LUCENE-664. Resolution: Fixed Going to close this one out for now, as I think we have gotten past the initial flurry of changes for the new docs. > [PATCH] small

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-675) Lucene benchmark: objective performance test for Lucene

2006-11-05 Thread Grant Ingersoll (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-675?page=comments#action_12447348 ] Grant Ingersoll commented on LUCENE-675: To run, checkout contrib/benchmark and then apply the benchmark.patch in the contrib/benchmark directory. > Lucen

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-675) Lucene benchmark: objective performance test for Lucene

2006-11-05 Thread Grant Ingersoll (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-675?page=all ] Grant Ingersoll updated LUCENE-675: --- Attachment: benchmark.patch Initial Benchmark code based on Andrzej original contribution plus some changes by me to use the Reuters "standard" collectio

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-675) Lucene benchmark: objective performance test for Lucene

2006-11-05 Thread Grant Ingersoll (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-675?page=comments#action_12447346 ] Grant Ingersoll commented on LUCENE-675: OK, here is a first crack at a standard benchmark contribution based on Andrzej original contribution and some upd

[jira] Resolved: (LUCENE-706) Index File Format - Example for frequency file .frq is wrong

2006-11-05 Thread Grant Ingersoll (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-706?page=all ] Grant Ingersoll resolved LUCENE-706. Resolution: Fixed Applied. Thanks Johan and Doron. > Index File Format - Example for frequency file .frq is wrong > --

Re: ParallelMultiSearcher reimplementation

2006-11-05 Thread Chuck Williams
Doug Cutting wrote on 11/03/2006 12:18 PM: > Chuck Williams wrote: >> Why would a thread pool be more controversial? Dynamically creating and >> garbaging threads has many downsides. > > The JVM already pools native threads, so mostly what's saved by thread > pools is the allocation & initializati