Re: Lucene 2.1, soon

2007-01-20 Thread Tarzan
Hi There, Congratulations to all Lucene developers for the upcoming release. I am new to Lucene/Nutch but as far I have read about the two, I really find it very interesting and wanna contribute in this project. But dont know where to start...a friend suggested to write parsers for any fil

Re: Lucene 2.1, soon

2007-01-20 Thread Tarzan
Hi There, Congratulations to all Lucene developers for the upcoming release. I am new to Lucene/Nutch but as far I have read about the two, I really find it very interesting and wanna contribute in this project. But dont know where to start...a friend suggested to write parsers for any fil

[jira] Closed: (LUCENE-675) Lucene benchmark: objective performance test for Lucene

2007-01-20 Thread Grant Ingersoll (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-675?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Grant Ingersoll closed LUCENE-675. -- This has been committed and is available for use. New issues can be opened on specific problems.

Re: [jira] Commented: (LUCENE-778) Allow overriding a Document

2007-01-20 Thread Nicolas Lalevée
Very interesting discussion. It matches some ideas I had about how Lucene works, I just wasn't sure of their relevance, only trying to hack Lucene for few months. I love the idea of decoupling the document being indexed, and the document being extracted from the index. It joins also some commen

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-710) Implement "point in time" searching without relying on filesystem semantics

2007-01-20 Thread Michael McCandless (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-710?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12466223 ] Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-710: --- One clarification on "different deletion policies": to support