[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-781?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12466930
]
Doron Cohen commented on LUCENE-781:
> ...either way, i'd still like clarification as to the orriginal point of t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-781?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12466927
]
Hoss Man commented on LUCENE-781:
-
i wasn't suggesting that the patch was flawed -- just trying to clarify what
circ
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-710?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12466926
]
Doron Cohen commented on LUCENE-710:
> The deletion policy is called on creation of a writer (onInit) and
> once
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-710?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12466911
]
Marvin Humphrey commented on LUCENE-710:
On Jan 23, 2007, at 2:19 PM, Michael McCandless (JIRA) wrote:
> Fir
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-762?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12466904
]
Chuck Williams commented on LUCENE-762:
---
I use FieldInfo heavily and many other package-level API's, but put my
On 1/23/07, Grant Ingersoll (JIRA) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-762?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12466885
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on LUCENE-762:
This
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-762?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12466887
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on LUCENE-762:
Hmm, I forgot to mention that FieldInfo is package local. This comp
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-762?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12466885
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on LUCENE-762:
This would also eliminate the need to change FieldsReader for every
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-781?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12466852
]
Doron Cohen commented on LUCENE-781:
I thought it would not break MultiReader, just do unnecessary work for that
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-781?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12466849
]
Daniel Naber commented on LUCENE-781:
-
Hoss, you're right, this breaks MultiReader, I will revert the patch. Funn
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-710?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12466846
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-710:
---
> I found a flaw in my plan. If the read locks are always app
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-781?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12466843
]
Hoss Man commented on LUCENE-781:
-
i haven't looked atthe patch, but i'm a little confused by the issue summary
...
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-781?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12466841
]
Daniel Naber commented on LUCENE-781:
-
Thanks for your feedback. I have committed my patch (but moved the testcas
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-781?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Daniel Naber updated LUCENE-781:
Summary: NPE in MultiReader.isCurrent() and getVersion() (was: NPe in
MultiReader.isCurrent() and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-710?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12466840
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-710:
---
> I don't really understand this interface and so I cannot see
Store all metadata in human-readable segments file
--
Key: LUCENE-783
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-783
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Improvement
Components:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-773?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless resolved LUCENE-773.
---
Resolution: Fixed
OK I added a unit test that hits the NPE, and corrected it so the t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-773?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless reopened LUCENE-773:
---
My fix here broke one case of backwards compatibility for Directory
implementations tha
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-710?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12466749
]
Marvin Humphrey commented on LUCENE-710:
I found a flaw in my plan. If the read locks are always applied, the
Donovan, Aaron wrote:
In anticipation of an upcoming 2.1 release, I started testing the
Berkeley Database - Java Edition Directory implementation. I
immediately received a NullPointerException while trying to create an
index. It was a result of the getLockFactory() returning null.
What is the
In anticipation of an upcoming 2.1 release, I started testing the
Berkeley Database - Java Edition Directory implementation. I
immediately received a NullPointerException while trying to create an
index. It was a result of the getLockFactory() returning null.
What is the new responsibility of D
21 matches
Mail list logo
