[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-837) contrib/benchmark QueryMaker and Task Refactorings

2007-03-19 Thread Grant Ingersoll (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-837?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Grant Ingersoll updated LUCENE-837: --- Attachment: benchmark-updates.patch See changes.txt in contrib/benchmark. Patch applies in c

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-837) contrib/benchmark QueryMaker and Task Refactorings

2007-03-19 Thread Grant Ingersoll (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-837?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Grant Ingersoll updated LUCENE-837: --- Summary: contrib/benchmark QueryMaker and Task Refactorings (was: QueryMaker Implementations

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-446) FunctionQuery - score based on field value

2007-03-19 Thread Hoss Man (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-446?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12482292 ] Hoss Man commented on LUCENE-446: - I just remembered one of the reasons why i didn't do this the last time i looked

[jira] Created: (LUCENE-837) QueryMaker Implementations

2007-03-19 Thread Grant Ingersoll (JIRA)
QueryMaker Implementations -- Key: LUCENE-837 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-837 Project: Lucene - Java Issue Type: Bug Components: contrib/benchmark Reporter: Grant Ingersoll

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-446) FunctionQuery - score based on field value

2007-03-19 Thread Hoss Man (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-446?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12482281 ] Hoss Man commented on LUCENE-446: - I'm in favor ... i think once upon a time Yonik held off because he wasn't sure i

Re: improving RAM usage by IndexWriter

2007-03-19 Thread Chris Hostetter
: It doesn't apply to SVN head just yet (I need to update the payloads : commit -- Michael: you returned the favor here!), it's not yet thread friendly : (though I can do that after first patch), it messes up the merge policy : when you flush by RAM and not by document count (this is actually alre

Re: Writing out the term count when merging

2007-03-19 Thread Matt Chaput
robert engels wrote: but a better solution, since you probably need a indexed file into the terms file, you might not even need the term count, since you should read the indexed file into memory anyway (read every 16 entries, etc.) - at which point you will know the number of terms in the file.

Re: Writing out the term count when merging

2007-03-19 Thread robert engels
but a better solution, since you probably need a indexed file into the terms file, you might not even need the term count, since you should read the indexed file into memory anyway (read every 16 entries, etc.) - at which point you will know the number of terms in the file. On Mar 19, 20

Re: Writing out the term count when merging

2007-03-19 Thread robert engels
write the term count at the end of the file, uncompressed On Mar 19, 2007, at 6:13 PM, Matt Chaput wrote: Hi all! I'm reimplementing a very Lucene-like search library as a learning experience and I've run into a snag. Before I go deep code diving, I thought I'd ask here in case someone has

Writing out the term count when merging

2007-03-19 Thread Matt Chaput
Hi all! I'm reimplementing a very Lucene-like search library as a learning experience and I've run into a snag. Before I go deep code diving, I thought I'd ask here in case someone has the time to answer. The term dictionary file includes the term count in a header. But when I'm merging segm

Re: improving RAM usage by IndexWriter

2007-03-19 Thread Michael McCandless
"Marvin Humphrey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I think some of these changes are similar to how KinoSearch builds a > > segment. > > Yup... sounds familiar. ;) > > > I'm still working through some lingering issues before I can make a > > clean patch, > > Well, where is it? Don't keep it a

improving RAM usage by IndexWriter

2007-03-19 Thread Michael McCandless
Woops! I meant for this to go to java-dev... Mike On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 08:09:37 -0400, "Michael McCandless" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > Hi, > > I've been looking into improving performance of IndexWriter, > specifically how it makes use of RAM to buffer added documents. > > I've created a new

Error: doc counts differ from segment_qsl

2007-03-19 Thread acsnaterse
Hi, I have a Lucene implementation which works good (I thought), but after a day (or few days) I don't get search results anymore and in the logs i see this error: doc counts differ for segment _qsl: fieldsReader shows 10 but segmentInfo shows 100 But I've done noting with the index. does anyon