[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-866) Multi-level skipping on posting lists

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-866?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Michael Busch updated LUCENE-866: - Fix Version/s: 2.2 > Multi-level skipping on posting lists >

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-730) Restore top level disjunction performance

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-730?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Michael Busch updated LUCENE-730: - Attachment: lucene-730.patch With this patch the old BooleanScorer is only used if BooleanQuery.

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-730) Restore top level disjunction performance

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-730?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Michael Busch updated LUCENE-730: - Fix Version/s: 2.2 > Restore top level disjunction performance >

[jira] Reopened: (LUCENE-730) Restore top level disjunction performance

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-730?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Michael Busch reopened LUCENE-730: -- Assignee: Michael Busch Lucene Fields: (was: [Patch Available, New]) As discussed on

Re: [jira] Resolved: (LUCENE-730) Restore top level disjunction performance

Chris Hostetter wrote: : With this committed it also makes sense to deprecate the setUseScorer14() : method and the corresponding get...() method. If you want a patch for that, : I'll gladly provide one. i haven't really been able to follow this issue as much as i would like, but docs now someti

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-888) Improve indexing performance by increasing internal buffer sizes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-888?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12498793 ] Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-888: -- > I'm actually coding it up now. Why don't you commit LUCENE-430 > sooni

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-430) Reducing buffer sizes for TermDocs.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-430?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12498792 ] Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-430: -- OK, I committed this patch that delays the allocation of the buffer afte

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-888) Improve indexing performance by increasing internal buffer sizes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-888?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12498787 ] Marvin Humphrey commented on LUCENE-888: I would like to know why these gains are appearing, and how specific

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-888) Improve indexing performance by increasing internal buffer sizes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-888?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12498784 ] Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-888: --- > > OK I will do this. Actually, I think we should also allow

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-888) Improve indexing performance by increasing internal buffer sizes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-888?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12498780 ] Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-888: -- > OK I will do this. Actually, I think we should also allow making the >

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-888) Improve indexing performance by increasing internal buffer sizes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-888?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12498776 ] Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-888: --- > > I plan to add "private int bufferSize" to BufferedIndexInp

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-888) Improve indexing performance by increasing internal buffer sizes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-888?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12498757 ] Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-888: -- > Actually, it does have a default public constructor right? Ie if we ad

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-888) Improve indexing performance by increasing internal buffer sizes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-888?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12498739 ] Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-888: --- > > I wonder if we should just add a ctor to BufferedIndexInpu

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-888) Improve indexing performance by increasing internal buffer sizes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-888?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12498714 ] Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-888: -- > I wonder if we should just add a ctor to BufferedIndexInput that takes

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-888) Improve indexing performance by increasing internal buffer sizes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-888?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12498696 ] Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-888: --- > > I'm guessing we should leave BufferedIndexInput's default

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-430) Reducing buffer sizes for TermDocs.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-430?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12498659 ] Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-430: -- Paul, you are right, the patch I submitted just avoids copying the buff

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-888) Improve indexing performance by increasing internal buffer sizes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-888?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12498652 ] Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-888: -- > At 1 KB (current Lucene trunk) it takes 622 sec to build the index; if

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-430) Reducing buffer sizes for TermDocs.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-430?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12498523 ] Paul Elschot commented on LUCENE-430: - Are you also going to try and make the buffer size dependent on the number