Grant Ingersoll wrote:
Mind you, our docs are an order of magnitude better than
this other project
I agree, Lucene is a very well documented project compared to many. In general
and in conjunction with LIA, it's a pretty easy project to get in to.
3. There is a whole lot of knowledge
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-888?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12499548
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-888:
---
I re-ran the second test above, but this time with compound
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-873?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Busch closed LUCENE-873.
Resolution: Fixed
This is fixed and verified.
nightly builds depend on clover
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-847?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Busch updated LUCENE-847:
-
Component/s: Index
Factor merge policy out of IndexWriter
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-802?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Busch resolved LUCENE-802.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Committed. Thanks Steven!
lucene jars should include LiCENSE and NOTICE
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-698?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Busch updated LUCENE-698:
-
Component/s: Search
Priority: Minor (was: Major)
FilteredQuery ignores boost
I'd wanna split my lucene index in smaller segments, each one holding all
terms starting with the same char.
I started writing Term's and TermInfo's but i'm worried about others files
and especially the pointers.
What care should I have while splitting index?
- Daniel
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-730?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Busch resolved LUCENE-730.
--
Resolution: Fixed
I just committed the latest patch. Thanks everyone!
Restore top level
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-349?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Busch resolved LUCENE-349.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: (was: Lucene Developers)
I compared the fileformat docs
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-794?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12499650
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-794:
--
Hi Mark,
I don't know the details of your patch. I just saw your class
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-794?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12499651
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-794:
Thanks Michael -- I was not aware and will certainly make the change in the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-698?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12499652
]
Hoss Man commented on LUCENE-698:
-
i think the test class and test case testFQ7 in particular are correct in the
: I'd wanna split my lucene index in smaller segments, each one holding all
: terms starting with the same char.
i can't even begin to give you any advice on how to implement this, but
perhaps i can save you some work by asking why?
-Hoss
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-698?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12499658
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-698:
--
perhaps it should test if either the score or the explanation value
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-698?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12499668
]
Hoss Man commented on LUCENE-698:
-
A ... yes, looking back at the comments in LUCENE-557 I remember now: I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-698?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12499673
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-698:
--
but we should probably also fix FilteredQuery so that a boost of 0
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-698?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12499674
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-698:
--
Maybe Query.setBoost() should throw an IllegalArgumentException
in case
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-698?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12499675
]
Hoss Man commented on LUCENE-698:
-
Hmmm.. didn't realize that. I withdrawal all previous comments. patch seems
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-698?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12499676
]
Hoss Man commented on LUCENE-698:
-
whoops .. comment collision.
i think the patch as it stands is fine for this
19 matches
Mail list logo