FilteredQuery explanation inaccuracy with boost
---
Key: LUCENE-903
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-903
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Search
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-903?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Doron Cohen updated LUCENE-903:
---
Attachment: lucene-903.patch
Attached lucene-903.patch change the explanation test in CheckHits to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-903?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Doron Cohen updated LUCENE-903:
---
Lucene Fields: [Patch Available] (was: [New])
FilteredQuery explanation inaccuracy with boost
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project lucene-java has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue affects
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project lucene-java has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue affects
Greetings Gumpers,
The Lucene-Java gump build seems to been failing consistently for the past
few days. The problem seems to relate to some cleanup we did recently to
our build files to help ensure that the various contrib sub projects
could be cleanly built/tested on their own, or as part of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-894?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hoss Man updated LUCENE-894:
Attachment: lucene-894.patch
Michael: this approach seems great. I couldn't help but make a few tweaks...
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-894?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hoss Man updated LUCENE-894:
Attachment: lucene-894.patch
whoops ... forgot to svn add src/demo/demo-build.template after i moved it ..
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-903?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12501067
]
Hoss Man commented on LUCENE-903:
-
I have some reservations about this patch.
I think it's fine to set as a goal
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-903?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12501074
]
Doron Cohen commented on LUCENE-903:
holding them to the same standard (when they can't easily modify
the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-903?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hoss Man updated LUCENE-903:
Attachment: lucene-903.patch
in general i'm not fond of the inspecting the string to determine whether the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-902?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12501078
]
Toru Matsuzawa commented on LUCENE-902:
---
My patch was consideration shortage as shown in the point.
However,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-622?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12501079
]
Hoss Man commented on LUCENE-622:
-
i just skimmed Sami's patch (did not test it) ... i can't help but think that
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-902?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12501080
]
Hoss Man commented on LUCENE-902:
-
without a unit test demonstrating an actual problem, i'm having a hard time
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-894?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12501081
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-894:
--
I couldn't help but make a few tweaks...
Thanks for reviewing!
1)
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-446?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12501082
]
Hoss Man commented on LUCENE-446:
-
Doron: I haven't really been able to keep up with the way this issue has
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-902?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12501085
]
Toru Matsuzawa commented on LUCENE-902:
---
for stop word only is.
sample words A is B.
For instance,When
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-831?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hoss Man updated LUCENE-831:
Attachment: fieldcache-overhaul.diff
i haven't had any time to do further work on this issue ... partly
: The part I am not sure of in this regard are my changes
: to FieldCache and FieldcacheImpl, while LUCENE-831 is
: ongoing too. (though btw 831 doesn't apply cleanly on
: current trunk). (It is my plan to get into LUCENE-831
: but I haven't got to it yet.)
1) i updated 831 to work on the trunk
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-894?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Busch resolved LUCENE-894.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Works great, Hoss! Thanks again. I just committed this.
Custom build.xml
Calculate MD5 checksums in target dist-all
Key: LUCENE-904
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-904
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: Build
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-904?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Busch updated LUCENE-904:
-
Attachment: lucene-904.patch
Calculate MD5 checksums in target dist-all
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-904?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12501097
]
Hoss Man commented on LUCENE-904:
-
FWIW ... i put something like this in the solr build.xml a while back, but
23 matches
Mail list logo
