[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-966?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12518636
]
Stanislaw Osinski commented on LUCENE-966:
--
> * I removed StandardAnalyzer.html "grammar doc" generation fr
Is this new page spam or is it just me?
Doron
Apache Wiki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 06/08/2007 00:25:25:
> Dear Wiki user,
>
> You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Lucene-
> java Wiki" for change notification.
>
> The following page has been changed by SandraVerso:
> http:/
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-550?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12518570
]
Karl Wettin commented on LUCENE-550:
> It also hit me that I could have a HashMap parallel to the
> List orderd
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-584?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12518569
]
Mark Harwood commented on LUCENE-584:
-
Hi Paul,
Many thanks for your responses.
Sorry for the delay in communicat
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-805?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12518567
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on LUCENE-805:
Hmm, might be cool to make things real for the demo by using either
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-966?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless resolved LUCENE-966.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Lucene Fields: [New, Patch Available] (was: [New])
OK I com
8 aug 2007 kl. 23.58 skrev Paul Smith:
I'm thinking no, but just in case, are lucene 2.3 snapshots
published anywhere, or should I build one locally?
There have been some discussion on keeping a snapshot repository
somewhere, but never more than that. So for now you need to build it
loca
On 8/8/07, Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 8/8/07, Ning Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > This reminds me: It'd be nice if we could support delete-by-query someday.
> > :)
> >
> > I was thinking people use deleteDocument(int docid) when they are sure
> > the docid hasn't changed since
I'm thinking no, but just in case, are lucene 2.3 snapshots published
anywhere, or should I build one locally?
More broadly, is there any plan to fully Mavenize the lucene trunk ?
I'm not sure if anyone had a chance to look the patch I supplied a
while back with a pom.xml that appeared to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-550?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Karl Wettin updated LUCENE-550:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-550_20070808_no_core_changes.txt
Added support for payloads
Reintroduced Instantia
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-971?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Steven Parkes updated LUCENE-971:
-
Attachment: LUCENE-971.patch.txt
All agreed and fixed. Thanks.
> Create enwiki indexable data as
On 8/8/07, Ning Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 8/8/07, Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Let's take a simple case of deleting documents in a range, like
> > date:[2006 TO 2008]
> > One would currently need to close the writer and open a new reader to
> > ensure that they can "see" all
On 8/8/07, Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Let's take a simple case of deleting documents in a range, like
> date:[2006 TO 2008]
> One would currently need to close the writer and open a new reader to
> ensure that they can "see" all the documents. Then execute a
> RangeQuery, collect th
On 8/8/07, Ning Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 8/8/07, Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 8/8/07, Ning Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > But you still think it's worth to be included in IndexWriter, right?
> >
> > I'm not sure... (unless I'm missing some obvious use-cases).
> > If
On 8/8/07, Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 8/8/07, Ning Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > But you still think it's worth to be included in IndexWriter, right?
>
> I'm not sure... (unless I'm missing some obvious use-cases).
> If one could get a list of IndexReaders, one could directly
On 8/8/07, Ning Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 8/8/07, Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > To make delete by docid useful, one needs a way to *get* those docids.
> > A callback after flush that provided acurrent list of readers for the
> > segments would serve.
>
> Interesting. That mak
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-971?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12518524
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-971:
---
Patch looks good; a few comments:
* In conf/wikipedia.alg:
On 8/8/07, Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> To make delete by docid useful, one needs a way to *get* those docids.
> A callback after flush that provided acurrent list of readers for the
> segments would serve.
Interesting. That makes sense.
> I think IndexWriter.deleteDocument(int doc)
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-966?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12518523
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-966:
---
Super, thanks!
> A faster JFlex-based replacement for Standar
Michael, are you still working on this replacement of the BLOB I/O?
I'm looking into parameterizing the option of lazy syncs of DML
operations (via calls to LuceneDomainIndex.sync potentially queued
using dbms_aq) which is convenient for bulk inserts vs. real-time
syncs for non-bulked operations f
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-966?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12518521
]
Stanislaw Osinski commented on LUCENE-966:
--
Absolutely -- the header was there only because I used Carrot2's
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-847?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12518520
]
Ning Li commented on LUCENE-847:
> Furthermore, I think this is all contained within IndexWriter, right?
> Ie when we
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-847?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12518508
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-847:
---
> It just occurred to me that there is a neat way to handle de
On 8/8/07, Ning Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm thinking about the impact of adding "deleteDocument(int doc)" on
To make delete by docid useful, one needs a way to *get* those docids.
A callback after flush that provided acurrent list of readers for the
segments would serve.
I think IndexWrit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-550?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12518489
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on LUCENE-550:
On the Payload question, it is still marked as experimental, but if
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-847?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12518486
]
Ning Li commented on LUCENE-847:
The following comments are about the impact on merge if we add
"deleteDocument(int d
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-550?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12518484
]
Karl Wettin commented on LUCENE-550:
Grant Ingersoll - 07/Aug/07 06:22 PM
> 1. No build file
> 2. Tests are virtu
I'm thinking about the impact of adding "deleteDocument(int doc)" on
LUCENE-847, especially on concurrent merge. The semantics of
"deleteDocument(int doc)" is that the document to delete is specified
by the document id on the index at the time of the call. When a merge
is finished and the result is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-966?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12518463
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-966:
---
I was gearing up to commit this, but realized the copyright o
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-847?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12518453
]
Ning Li commented on LUCENE-847:
On 8/8/07, Michael McCandless (JIRA) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Actually I was tal
On 8/7/07, Steven Parkes (JIRA) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> [
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-847?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12518210
> ]
>
> Steven Parkes commented on LUCENE-847:
> --
>
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-847?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12518435
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-847:
---
New feedback:
* Are you going to fix all unit tests that ca
Uh, nevermind! I see that is in the "Please do not:" section :)
Erik
On Aug 8, 2007, at 8:07 AM, Erik Hatcher wrote:
Don't we discourage @author tags? I can't recall where the
Lucene project sits on this issue, but it certainly has been
debated and acted upon in many other AS
Don't we discourage @author tags? I can't recall where the Lucene
project sits on this issue, but it certainly has been debated and
acted upon in many other ASF projects.
Erik
On Aug 7, 2007, at 6:27 PM, Apache Wiki wrote:
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page o
34 matches
Mail list logo
