[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1044?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12547351
]
Doug Cutting commented on LUCENE-1044:
--
> I think this means when we do a "soft commit" we should not in fact
>
Grant Ingersoll wrote:
> Hmm, they (YourKit) gave me an O/S license...
>
Oh cool. I haven't contacted them yet, I just read on their page that
they would ask for a link. OK, I'll try my luck...
Thanks,
-Michael
-
To unsubscribe
Hmm, they (YourKit) gave me an O/S license...
-Grant
On Nov 30, 2007, at 2:51 PM, Michael Busch wrote:
Hi all,
I was wondering which tools you guys are using to profile Lucene? I
tried out YourKit (they offer 15-days evaluation licenses) and so
far I
like it. They offer a free open-source
Hi all,
I was wondering which tools you guys are using to profile Lucene? I
tried out YourKit (they offer 15-days evaluation licenses) and so far I
like it. They offer a free open-source license
(http://www.yourkit.com/purchase/index.jsp), however they ask to add a
reference to their website to th
Well, we could also switch to the "sync before close" option. It
automatically bypasses all these tricky questions. Since we already
have all these files open for writing, anyway, it makes sense to do
the syncing with those descriptors?
It's just that commit() is somewhat awkward in that case a
I would argue that implementation does not adhere to the published
API...
On Nov 30, 2007, at 12:48 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
On Nov 30, 2007 1:18 PM, robert engels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I don't know, the Java guys are pretty good about making sure their
API works consistently across all
On Nov 30, 2007 1:18 PM, robert engels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't know, the Java guys are pretty good about making sure their
> API works consistently across all platforms, or at least documenting
> the cases where it wouldn't.
One way to consistency is a lowest-common-denominator approa
I don't know, the Java guys are pretty good about making sure their
API works consistently across all platforms, or at least documenting
the cases where it wouldn't.
I would start with a read only descriptor and get it into the field.
You could always have a runtime property that controller
On Nov 30, 2007 12:42 PM, robert engels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It is unclear if you need to open them for writing. The unix specs
> clearly allow you do call fsync on ANY file descriptor.
>
> The Linux docs seem to imply that a file descriptor opened for write
> is required.
>
> The Java spec
It is unclear if you need to open them for writing. The unix specs
clearly allow you do call fsync on ANY file descriptor.
The Linux docs seem to imply that a file descriptor opened for write
is required.
The Java specification allows it on ANY file descriptor as well -
this should be the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1044?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12547217
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1044:
>From java-dev, Robert Engels wrote:
{quote}
My reading of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1044?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12547168
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1044:
Another nuance here is ... say we do a "soft commit" (write
Here is a relevant email on the subject (from a very long impassioned
thread...)
http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0207.1/1632.html
On Nov 30, 2007, at 7:31 AM, robert engels wrote:
My reading of the Unix specification shows it should work (the
_commit under Windows is less clea
My reading of the Unix specification shows it should work (the
_commit under Windows is less clear, and since Windows is not inode
based, there may be different issues).
http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/007908799/xsh/fsync.html
On Nov 30, 2007, at 7:10 AM, Michael McCandless (JIRA) wrote
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1044?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12547122
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1044:
{quote}
You could just queue the file names for sync, close
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-982?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless resolved LUCENE-982.
---
Resolution: Fixed
I just committed this.
> Create new method optimize(int maxNumSegm
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1072?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-1072:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-1072.patch
Attached patch. I plan to commit in a day or two.
I
17 matches
Mail list logo
