Hi all,
I just released Luke 0.8, the Lucene Index Toolbox. As usually, you
can get it here:
http://www.getopt.org/luke/
This release upgrades to the official Lucene 2.3.0 release JARs.
NOTE: this version of Luke requires Java 1.5 or higher.
The following changes have been made in this
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1157?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12565621#action_12565621
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on LUCENE-1157:
-
The nightly javadocs are on the Hudson
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1026?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Miller updated LUCENE-1026:
Attachment: IndexAccessor-02.04.2008.zip
Putting up a new rev and hoping for some feedback.
Certa
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1157?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12565585#action_12565585
]
steve_rowe edited comment on LUCENE-1157 at 2/4/08 2:49 PM:
-
G
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1157?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12565585#action_12565585
]
Steven Rowe commented on LUCENE-1157:
-
Grant, how are the nightly javadocs copied to t
OK let's leave it as is then...
Mike
Doron Cohen wrote:
--=_Part_14341_779894.1202125161167
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
On Mon, Feb 4, 2008 at 11:56 AM, Michael McCandless <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I sort o
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-855?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Matt Ericson updated LUCENE-855:
Attachment: FieldCacheRangeFilter_Lucene_2.3.0.patch
I have changed the FiledCacheRangeFilter so th
On Mon, Feb 4, 2008 at 11:56 AM, Michael McCandless <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I sort of felt that it should be done even when eraseIndex=false,
ok I guess I can live with this.
but, how about instead we make it an explicit task, and don't reset
> the clock inside reinit()?
>
> Here's the
I sort of felt that it should be done even when eraseIndex=false,
but, how about instead we make it an explicit task, and don't reset
the clock inside reinit()?
Here's the patch:
Index: src/java/org/apache/lucene/benchmark/byTask/tasks/
ResetLogClockTask.java