[ANN] Luke 0.8 released

2008-02-04 Thread Andrzej Bialecki
Hi all, I just released Luke 0.8, the Lucene Index Toolbox. As usually, you can get it here: http://www.getopt.org/luke/ This release upgrades to the official Lucene 2.3.0 release JARs. NOTE: this version of Luke requires Java 1.5 or higher. The following changes have been made in this

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1157) Formatable changes log (CHANGES.txt is easy to edit but not so friendly to read by Lucene users)

2008-02-04 Thread Grant Ingersoll (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1157?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12565621#action_12565621 ] Grant Ingersoll commented on LUCENE-1157: - The nightly javadocs are on the Hudson

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-1026) Provide a simple way to concurrently access a Lucene index from multiple threads

2008-02-04 Thread Mark Miller (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1026?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mark Miller updated LUCENE-1026: Attachment: IndexAccessor-02.04.2008.zip Putting up a new rev and hoping for some feedback. Certa

[jira] Issue Comment Edited: (LUCENE-1157) Formatable changes log (CHANGES.txt is easy to edit but not so friendly to read by Lucene users)

2008-02-04 Thread Steven Rowe (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1157?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12565585#action_12565585 ] steve_rowe edited comment on LUCENE-1157 at 2/4/08 2:49 PM: - G

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1157) Formatable changes log (CHANGES.txt is easy to edit but not so friendly to read by Lucene users)

2008-02-04 Thread Steven Rowe (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1157?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12565585#action_12565585 ] Steven Rowe commented on LUCENE-1157: - Grant, how are the nightly javadocs copied to t

Re: svn commit: r617991 - /lucene/java/trunk/contrib/benchmark/src/java/org/apache/lucene/benchmark/byTask/PerfRunData.java

2008-02-04 Thread Michael McCandless
OK let's leave it as is then... Mike Doron Cohen wrote: --=_Part_14341_779894.1202125161167 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline On Mon, Feb 4, 2008 at 11:56 AM, Michael McCandless < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I sort o

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-855) MemoryCachedRangeFilter to boost performance of Range queries

2008-02-04 Thread Matt Ericson (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-855?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Matt Ericson updated LUCENE-855: Attachment: FieldCacheRangeFilter_Lucene_2.3.0.patch I have changed the FiledCacheRangeFilter so th

Re: svn commit: r617991 - /lucene/java/trunk/contrib/benchmark/src/java/org/apache/lucene/benchmark/byTask/PerfRunData.java

2008-02-04 Thread Doron Cohen
On Mon, Feb 4, 2008 at 11:56 AM, Michael McCandless < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I sort of felt that it should be done even when eraseIndex=false, ok I guess I can live with this. but, how about instead we make it an explicit task, and don't reset > the clock inside reinit()? > > Here's the

Re: svn commit: r617991 - /lucene/java/trunk/contrib/benchmark/src/java/org/apache/lucene/benchmark/byTask/PerfRunData.java

2008-02-04 Thread Michael McCandless
I sort of felt that it should be done even when eraseIndex=false, but, how about instead we make it an explicit task, and don't reset the clock inside reinit()? Here's the patch: Index: src/java/org/apache/lucene/benchmark/byTask/tasks/ ResetLogClockTask.java