[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1260?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12587446#action_12587446
]
Karl Wettin commented on LUCENE-1260:
-
I notice there is a tyop in the patch. And ther
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1260?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12587445#action_12587445
]
Karl Wettin commented on LUCENE-1260:
-
{quote}
1) "norms" is a vague term. currently "
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1262?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Trejkaz updated LUCENE-1262:
Attachment: Test.java
Attaching a test program to reproduce the problem under 2.3.1.
It occurs approximat
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1262?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Trejkaz updated LUCENE-1262:
Affects Version/s: (was: 2.1)
2.3.1
Summary: IndexOutOfBoundsExcep
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1260?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12587435#action_12587435
]
Hoss Man commented on LUCENE-1260:
--
bq. My use case is really about document boost and no
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1262?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Trejkaz updated LUCENE-1262:
Affects Version/s: (was: 2.2)
2.1
Okay I'll eat my words now, it is indeed 2.1
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1262?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Trejkaz updated LUCENE-1262:
Affects Version/s: (was: 2.3.1)
2.2
Whoops. I don't think it's 2.1 but it must
On Apr 9, 2008, at 6:35 AM, Michael Busch wrote:
We also need to come up with a good solution for the dictionary,
because a term with frq/prx postings needs to store two (or three
for skiplist) file pointers in the dictionary, whereas e. g. a
"binary" posting list only needs one pointer.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1260?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12587290#action_12587290
]
Karl Wettin commented on LUCENE-1260:
-
{quote}
As long as the norm remains a fixed siz
Hi:
Have been reading the 2.3.1 release code and have a few questions
regarding indexReader reopen:
1) looking at the code:
if (this.hasChanges || this.isCurrent()) {
// the index hasn't changed - nothing to do here
return this;
}
Shouldn't it be !this.hasChanges?
Just for kicks, I tried it on a 64 bit Athlon, linux_x86_64, jvm=64
bit Sun 1.6 -server.
The explicit loop counter was 50% faster (for N=10... the inner loop)
-Yonik
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 8:21 PM, Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 7:48 PM, robert engels <[EMAIL PRO
I think it is going to be highly JVM dependent.
I reworked it to call each twice (and reordered the tests)... the
foreach is still faster. Ialso ran it on Windows (under Parallels)
and got similar results, but in some cases the indexed was faster.
"server" times are tough to judge because n
Hi,
I confirm your results. I didn't think there could be a difference using
foreach constructs...
Cedric
Steven A Rowe wrote:
>
> On 04/04/2008 at 4:40 AM, Toke Eskildsen wrote:
>> On Wed, 2008-04-02 at 09:30 -0400, Mark Miller wrote:
>> > > - replacement of indexed for loops with for each c
Thanks for your quick answers.
Michael McCandless wrote:
Hi Michael,
I've actually been working on factoring DocumentsWriter, as a first
step towards flexible indexing.
Cool, yeah separating the DocumentsWriter into multiple classes
certainly helped understanding the complex code better.
palexv a écrit :
Hello all.
I have a question to advanced in lucene.
I have a set of phrases which I need to store in index.
Is there is a way of storing phrases as terms in index?
How is the best way of writing such index? Should this field be tokenized?
not tokenized
What is the best wa
Hello all.
I have a question to advanced in lucene.
I have a set of phrases which I need to store in index.
Is there is a way of storing phrases as terms in index?
How is the best way of writing such index? Should this field be tokenized?
What is the best way of searching phrases by mask in suc
Hi Toke,
On 04/09/2008 at 2:43 AM, Toke Eskildsen wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-04-08 at 18:48 -0500, robert engels wrote:
> > That is opposite of my testing:...
> >
> > The 'foreach' is consistently faster. The time difference is
> > independent of the size of the array. What I know about JVM
> > implem
Thanks Mike/Hoss for the clarification.
Antony
Michael McCandless wrote:
Chris Hostetter wrote:
: > But, StandardTokenizer is public? It "exports" those constants
for you?
:
: Really? Sorry, but I can't find them - in 2.3.1 sources, there are no
: references to those statics. Javadocs h
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1262?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12587117#action_12587117
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1262:
Those stack traces look like 2.1
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1150?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-1150:
---
Fix Version/s: 2.3.2
Backported fix to 2.3.2.
> The token types of the standard tok
Chris Hostetter wrote:
: > But, StandardTokenizer is public? It "exports" those constants
for you?
:
: Really? Sorry, but I can't find them - in 2.3.1 sources, there
are no
: references to those statics. Javadocs have no reference to them in
: StandardTokenizer
I think Michael is forg
lucene4varma a écrit :
Hi all,
I am new to lucene and am using it for text search in my web application,
and for that i need to index records in database.
We are using jdbc directory to store the indexes. Now the problem is when is
start the process of indexing the records for the first time it
22 matches
Mail list logo
