[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1290?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12598199#action_12598199
]
Paul Elschot commented on LUCENE-1290:
--
>From the more or less regular mailing list d
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1290?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12598190#action_12598190
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-1290:
---
Otis,
what do you think are the advantages
"Michael McCandless" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I agree the situation is not ideal, and it's confusing.
>
> This comes back to LUCENE-969.
>
> At the time, we decided to keep both String & char[] only to avoid
> performance cost for those analyzer chains that use String tokens
> exclusively.
"Michael McCandless" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I agree the situation is not ideal, and it's confusing.
>
> This comes back to LUCENE-969.
>
> At the time, we decided to keep both String & char[] only to avoid
> performance cost for those analyzer chains that use String tokens
> exclusively.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1290?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12598170#action_12598170
]
Otis Gospodnetic commented on LUCENE-1290:
--
I'm actually feeling -1-ish about thi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1290?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12598149#action_12598149
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-1290:
---
Thanks for the review, Hoss!
Your suggesti
On May 19, 2008, at 4:33 PM, Michael McCandless wrote:
DM Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Michael McCandless wrote:
I agree the situation is not ideal, and it's confusing.
My problem as a user is that I have to read the code to figure out
how to
optimally use the class. The JavaDoc is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1290?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12598143#action_12598143
]
Hoss Man commented on LUCENE-1290:
--
FYI: when applying the patch, i got two failed hunks
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1288?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12598140#action_12598140
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-1288:
--
Probably best to add getGeneration me
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1290?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12598109#action_12598109
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-1290:
---
{quote}
FWIW, the Hits API was originally d
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1290?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12598105#action_12598105
]
Doug Cutting commented on LUCENE-1290:
--
FWIW, the Hits API was originally designed to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-954?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12598092#action_12598092
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-954:
--
{quote}
If someone opens a Jira issue to depre
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1290?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Busch updated LUCENE-1290:
--
Attachment: lucene-1290.patch
> Deprecate Hits
> --
>
> Key: LUCEN
Deprecate Hits
--
Key: LUCENE-1290
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1290
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Task
Components: Search
Reporter: Michael Busch
Assignee: Michael Busc
DM Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Michael McCandless wrote:
>>
>> I agree the situation is not ideal, and it's confusing.
>
> My problem as a user is that I have to read the code to figure out how to
> optimally use the class. The JavaDoc is a bit wanting.
Yeah we should fix the javadocs.
>>
Make FieldDocSortedHitQueue and methods public, make
FieldSortedHitQueue.fillFields public
---
Key: LUCENE-1289
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1289
Copied from
http://lucene.grantingersoll.com/2008/05/18/open-source-search-engine-relevance/
For a while now, I have been trying to get my hands on TREC data for
the Lucene project. For those who aren’t familiar, TREC is an annual
competition for search engines that provides a common set of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1288?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless reassigned LUCENE-1288:
--
Assignee: Michael McCandless
> Add getVersion method to IndexCommit
>
I found an interesting piece of code, called Retro Weaver, that allows
one to develop Java 5 code and make it byte code compatible with Java 1.4.
See: http://retroweaver.sourceforge.net/
I still have a significant user base that is stuck with Java 1.4 (i.e.
MacOSX 10.3) and was planning to mai
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1284?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12597979#action_12597979
]
Otis Gospodnetic commented on LUCENE-1284:
--
Thanks, I'll have a look later this w
Michael McCandless wrote:
I agree the situation is not ideal, and it's confusing.
My problem as a user is that I have to read the code to figure out how
to optimally use the class. The JavaDoc is a bit wanting.
This comes back to LUCENE-969.
At the time, we decided to keep both String & cha
Add getVersion method to IndexCommit
Key: LUCENE-1288
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1288
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Improvement
Affects Versions: 2.3.1
Reporter
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1261?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
John Adams closed LUCENE-1261.
--
Resolution: Duplicate
This issue is a near duplicate of LUCENE-1260 (see
https://issues.apache.org/ji
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1282?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12597931#action_12597931
]
Ismael Juma commented on LUCENE-1282:
-
Btw, if I increase the number of iterations to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1282?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12597926#action_12597926
]
Ismael Juma commented on LUCENE-1282:
-
Great work finding a reduced test-case. I tried
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1282?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12597919#action_12597919
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1282:
Using the 19 GB index I have that
I agree the situation is not ideal, and it's confusing.
This comes back to LUCENE-969.
At the time, we decided to keep both String & char[] only to avoid
performance cost for those analyzer chains that use String tokens
exclusively.
The idea was to allow Token to keep both text or char[] and som
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1229?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12597897#action_12597897
]
Hiroaki Kawai commented on LUCENE-1229:
---
{quote}
I think that makes sense, as long a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1284?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Felipe Sánchez Martínez updated LUCENE-1284:
Attachment: (was: apertium-morph.2008-05-12.tgz)
> Set of Java classes
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1284?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Felipe Sánchez Martínez updated LUCENE-1284:
Attachment: apertium-morph.2008-05-19.tgz
Typo in a package name: src/java
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1284?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Felipe Sánchez Martínez updated LUCENE-1284:
Attachment: (was: apertium-morph.2008-05-12.patch)
> Set of Java class
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1029?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12597883#action_12597883
]
Marko Asplund commented on LUCENE-1029:
---
I've switched projects some time ago so it'
32 matches
Mail list logo
