[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-1340) Make it posible not to include TF information in index

2008-07-19 Thread Michael McCandless (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1340?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-1340: --- Attachment: LUCENE-1340.patch Thanks eks, that was fast -- I think you set a new

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1337) [PATCH] improve searching under high concurrancy

2008-07-19 Thread Michael McCandless (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1337?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12614971#action_12614971 ] Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1337: bq. Yonik checked in a

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-753) Use NIO positional read to avoid synchronization in FSIndexInput

2008-07-19 Thread Michael McCandless (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-753?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12614974#action_12614974 ] Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-753: --- I created a large index (indexed

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-1340) Make it posible not to include TF information in index

2008-07-19 Thread Eks Dev (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1340?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eks Dev updated LUCENE-1340: Attachment: LUCENE-1340.patch Thanks Mike, with just a little bit more hand-holding we are going to be

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1339) Add IndexReader.acquire() and release() methods using IndexReader's ref counting

2008-07-19 Thread Andi Vajda (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1339?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12615001#action_12615001 ] Andi Vajda commented on LUCENE-1339: That would work just as well ! Andi.. Add

Re: IndexReader.acquire()/release() ?

2008-07-19 Thread Andi Vajda
On Fri, 18 Jul 2008, Yonik Seeley wrote: Although I do wonder if incRef() and decRef() aren't more suitable names. Just make those methods public, which the caveat that one should not call them on a closed reader. They are expert level APIs after all. That would work just as well. The

[jira] Created: (LUCENE-1341) BoostingNearQuery class (prototype)

2008-07-19 Thread Peter Keegan (JIRA)
BoostingNearQuery class (prototype) --- Key: LUCENE-1341 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1341 Project: Lucene - Java Issue Type: Improvement Components: Query/Scoring Affects

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-1341) BoostingNearQuery class (prototype)

2008-07-19 Thread Peter Keegan (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1341?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Peter Keegan updated LUCENE-1341: - Attachment: BoostingNearQuery.java bnq.patch BoostingNearQuery class

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1341) BoostingNearQuery class (prototype)

2008-07-19 Thread Peter Keegan (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1341?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12615004#action_12615004 ] Peter Keegan commented on LUCENE-1341: -- Note that this patch requires java 1.5 or