Correction - meant greedy not lazy.
Mark Miller wrote:
Looks pretty interesting. A lazy span implementation could certainly
be useful for certain highlighting situations. Barrier of entry looks
a bit high unfortunately, but the text def helps for anyone looking to
learn how the current spanque
On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 6:01 AM, Michael McCandless (JIRA)
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Spinoff from here:
>
>
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/lucene-java-user/200809.mbox/%3Cba72f77f0809111418l29cf215dnd45bf679832d7d42%40mail.gmail.com%3E
I had to go to another email archive to fin
Looks pretty interesting. A lazy span implementation could certainly be
useful for certain highlighting situations. Barrier of entry looks a bit
high unfortunately, but the text def helps for anyone looking to learn
how the current spanquery stuff works.
Paul Elschot wrote:
A bit late in rea
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1380?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12630700#action_12630700
]
Karl Wettin commented on LUCENE-1380:
-
One could argue that what you should do rather
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1155?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12630687#action_12630687
]
Karl Wettin commented on LUCENE-1155:
-
bq. Sorry, I still don't get it, but I'm probab
Argh it's is a Heisenbug!
I'll keep running the test over & over to see if I can get it to happen.
And I'll at least commit that change so when it does happen again we
get more detail.
Mike
Steven A Rowe wrote:
I applied the patch and then the test refused to fail.
I removed the patch a
I applied the patch and then the test refused to fail.
I removed the patch and the test still refused to fail.
I'm not sure what happened - AFAIK I didn't change anything. I ran the test
about five times previously and it always failed :(.
Maybe it's Microsoft's gentle way of telling me it's t
On Sep 12, 2008, at 12:55 AM, Antony Bowesman wrote:
There was a message from Kirk Roberts, 18/4/2007 - MultiSearcher vs
MultiReader
Grant mentioned the visibility of the readerIndex() method in
MultiReader, but nothing seems ever came of it.
Kirk never followed up, AFAICT.
Is there
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1379?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Paul Elschot updated LUCENE-1379:
-
Attachment: LUCENE-1379-test.patch
The bug occurs only for the last matching doc.
The attached L
I can't get it to fail, on Windows Server 2003, Sun Java 1.4.2_15.
Unfortunately the test doesn't give us the traceback on failure (just
the message "null"). Can you apply this, get the test to fail, and
post back the traceback?
Index: src/test/org/apache/lucene/index/TestIndexReaderReope
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1385?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12630658#action_12630658
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1385:
---
I forget to mention: When index was modifie
IndexReader.isIndexCurrent()==false -> IndexReader.reopen() -> still index not
current
--
Key: LUCENE-1385
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1385
Proj
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1155?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12630655#action_12630655
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on LUCENE-1155:
-
Sorry, I still don't get it, but I'm pr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1279?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Steven Rowe updated LUCENE-1279:
Attachment: LUCENE-1279.patch
Updated to current trunk revision (694771). Mostly this consisted o
When I try to run all of the unit tests, TestIndexReaderReopen is consistently
failing:
[junit] Testsuite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestIndexReaderReopen
[junit] null)
[junit] Tests run: 13, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 116.375 sec
[junit]
[junit] Testcase:
testThrea
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1155?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12630638#action_12630638
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1155:
Grant, what do you think of this
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1382?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12630629#action_12630629
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1382:
It seems like there is a place fo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1380?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Karl Wettin updated LUCENE-1380:
Attachment: LUCENE-1380.patch
Renamed field to usingPositionIncrement to avoid confusion, and adde
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1382?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12630569#action_12630569
]
Mark Harwood commented on LUCENE-1382:
--
I feel uncomfortable with the suggestion of i
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1279?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12630563#action_12630563
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on LUCENE-1279:
-
Steve, can you update this for trunk (a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1379?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12630562#action_12630562
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1379:
-
How does it fail Paul? I am trying to duplicate
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1380?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Karl Wettin reassigned LUCENE-1380:
---
Assignee: Karl Wettin
> Patch for ShingleFilter.enablePositions
> --
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1382?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12630561#action_12630561
]
Nadav Har'El commented on LUCENE-1382:
--
Hi Mike,
If you add this feature, I suggest y
7 issues now
There are two unassigned ones:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1380 Patch for
ShingleFilter.enablePositions
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1379 SpanScorer fails
when sloppyFreq() returns 0
Can a committer who's comfortable in those areas pleas
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1344?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12630551#action_12630551
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1344:
{quote}
About the missing header
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1384?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-1384:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-1384.patch
Attached patch. I plan to commit in a day or to to 2.
This would be most welcome, thanks!
I don't think you get a buddy -- everyone on this list can respond as
you have questions, post patches etc.
I would recommend being very incremental -- pick one class and rev its
javadocs, open an issue & attach a patch, and iterate from there.
Mike
R
addIndexesNoOptimize intermittantly throws incorrect "segment exists in
external directory..." exception
Key: LUCENE-1384
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/
Chris, if possible, could you try out this patch to see if it fixes
the leak you're seeing? Thanks!
Mike
Michael McCandless (JIRA) wrote:
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1383?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless upd
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1354?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless resolved LUCENE-1354.
Resolution: Fixed
Grant, this is now fixed right?
> Provide Programmatic Access t
As a relatively new Lucene user, I rather struggled through figuring out
how to use it. Now that I have done so, and am in the process of using
it to enhance an application I am working on, I would like to make the
team an offer.
Many of the core classes (and likely other classes as well) have lit
Lara in Bikini
http://gossipjungle.blogspot.com/2008/09/lara-in-bikini.html
For Many More Videos,Pictures,and Gossips, Plz Visit
http://gossipjungle.blogspot.com
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google G
32 matches
Mail list logo
