[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1296) Allow use of compact DocIdSet in CachingWrapperFilter

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1296?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12641973#action_12641973 ] Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1296: I guess we should deprecate the f

[jira] Assigned: (LUCENE-1296) Allow use of compact DocIdSet in CachingWrapperFilter

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1296?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Michael McCandless reassigned LUCENE-1296: -- Assignee: Michael McCandless > Allow use of compact DocIdSet in CachingWrapper

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1296) Allow use of compact DocIdSet in CachingWrapperFilter

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1296?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12641968#action_12641968 ] Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1296: Sigh. Should have marked it as 2

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1427) QueryWrapperFilter should not do scoring

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1427?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12641963#action_12641963 ] Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1427: Excellent! That's about as simpl

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1427) QueryWrapperFilter should not do scoring

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1427?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12641930#action_12641930 ] Paul Elschot commented on LUCENE-1427: -- Indeed a simple win, but it can be even simpl

[jira] Created: (LUCENE-1427) QueryWrapperFilter should not do scoring

QueryWrapperFilter should not do scoring Key: LUCENE-1427 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1427 Project: Lucene - Java Issue Type: Improvement Components: Search

Re: [VOTE] Relax backwards-compatibility policy for package-protected APIs

On Oct 21, 2008, at 6:49 PM, Michael Busch wrote: Doug Cutting wrote: Michael Busch wrote: Currently Lucene's backwards compatibility policy states: "That's to say, any code developed against X.0 should continue to run without alteration against all X.N releases." In LUCENE-1422 the ques

Re: [VOTE] Relax backwards-compatibility policy for package-protected APIs

On Oct 22, 2008, at 5:27 AM, Michael McCandless wrote: I think *not* having to maintain back compat of the package private APIs is very important to keeping our freedom (and sanity!) to continue to improve Lucene. This is similar to marking a new API as experimental and subject to sudde

Re: [VOTE] Relax backwards-compatibility policy for package-protected APIs

Michael McCandless wrote: I think *not* having to maintain back compat of the package private APIs is very important to keeping our freedom (and sanity!) to continue to improve Lucene. This is similar to marking a new API as experimental and subject to suddenly change in the next release: it

Re: [VOTE] Relax backwards-compatibility policy for package-protected APIs

I think *not* having to maintain back compat of the package private APIs is very important to keeping our freedom (and sanity!) to continue to improve Lucene. This is similar to marking a new API as experimental and subject to suddenly change in the next release: it reserves our future f

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1426) Next steps towards flexible indexing

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1426?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12641747#action_12641747 ] Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1426: bq. TermDocs could have a list of

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1342) 64bit JVM crashes on Linux

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1342?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12641743#action_12641743 ] Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1342: Please post back on whether Java