[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1450?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Steven Rowe updated LUCENE-1450:
Attachment: LUCENE-1450.patch
This patch modifies the RangeTermEnum constructor as described, and
RangeQuery & RangeFilter used with collation seek to lowerTerm using compareTo()
Key: LUCENE-1450
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1450
Project: Lucene -
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1422?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Busch updated LUCENE-1422:
--
Attachment: lucene-1422-take5.patch
Changes in this patch:
- updated patch to current trunk
-
See http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Lucene-trunk/643/changes
Changes:
[buschmi] LUCENE-1424: Changed QueryParser#newRangeQuery() to return a
ConstantScoreRangeQuery to make backwards-compatibility tests pass again; this
does not change any behavior since ConstantScoreRangeQuery subcla
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1422?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12646773#action_12646773
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-1422:
---
{quote}
It seems "something" is not clearly
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1424?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Busch resolved LUCENE-1424.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Committed revision 713225.
> Change all multi-term querys so that they ex
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1424?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Busch updated LUCENE-1424:
--
Attachment: lucene-1424.patch
Here's the patch.
'ant test test-tag' passes now.
I'll commit
> This looks like a good idea, thanks!
>
> If a given Tokenizer does not need to do any character normalization
(I would think most wouldn't) is there any added cost during
tokenization with this change?
Thank you for your reply, Mike!
There is no added cost if Tokenizer doesn't need to call c
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1424?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12646721#action_12646721
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1424:
-
For kicks, I tried implementing the MultiTermGe
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1435?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12646717#action_12646717
]
Steven Rowe commented on LUCENE-1435:
-
{quote}
bq. Perhaps I'm missing something, but
This looks like a good idea, thanks!
If a given Tokenizer does not need to do any character normalization
(I would think most wouldn't) is there any added cost during
tokenization with this change?
Mike
Koji Sekiguchi wrote:
I'm working on SOLR-822 and trying to introduce new classes
C
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1449?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless resolved LUCENE-1449.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.9
Committed revision 713206.
Thanks Mar
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1435?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12646699#action_12646699
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1435:
bq. IndexableBinaryStringTools (L
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1449?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-1449:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-1449.patch
OK I attached a new patch, this time including the sim
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1435?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12646679#action_12646679
]
Steven Rowe commented on LUCENE-1435:
-
bq. And wouldn't there be times when you also w
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1449?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-1449:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-1449.patch
Excellent!
I modified your test -- cleaned up whitesp
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1435?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12646667#action_12646667
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1435:
bq. Are you suggesting to not st
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1444?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=1264#action_1264
]
steve_rowe edited comment on LUCENE-1444 at 11/11/08 1:05 PM:
--
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1444?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Steven Rowe updated LUCENE-1444:
Attachment: LUCENE-1444.patch
After generating the site with Forrest and then copying over the gen
Michael McCandless wrote:
This stuff is confusing! I think your numbers are not right. Let's
try reformatting with CHAR=POS.
Here's your example without the +1:
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
a=0 b=1 c=2 d=3 =4 t=5 h=6 e=7 c=8 r=9 u=10 n=11 c=12 h=13 =14 m=15
a=16 n=17
This stuff is confusing! I think your numbers are not right. Let's
try reformatting with CHAR=POS.
Here's your example without the +1:
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
a=0 b=1 c=2 d=3 =4 t=5 h=6 e=7 c=8 r=9 u=10 n=11 c=12 h=13 =14 m=15
a=16 n=17
abcd 0-4
crunch 8-14
Is it? Lets straighten this out. Here is what I see from my test for:
field = "abcd the"
field = "crunch man"
abcd thecrunch man
a0b1c2d3 4t5h6e7c8r9u10n11c12h13 14m15a16n17
Without the +1 I got:
abcd: 0-4
crunch: 7-13
man: 14-17
Something like that anyway.
With +1 I got:
abcd:0-4
crunch:8
Michael McCandless (JIRA) wrote:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1448?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-1448:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-1448.patch
Attached new patch (
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1448?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-1448:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-1448.patch
Attached new patch (changes described below):
bq. You
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1424?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12646639#action_12646639
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1424:
Thanks Michael!
> Change all mul
Hi Ivan,
On Fri, Nov 07, 2008, Ivan.S (JIRA) wrote about "[jira] Created: (LUCENE-1439)
Inconsistent API":
> The API of Lucene is totally inconsistent:
I think this statement is a bit too harsh. I have experience with several
search engine APIs, and in many areas, in my opinion Lucene's is the
c
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1435?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12646619#action_12646619
]
Steven Rowe commented on LUCENE-1435:
-
Hi Mike,
bq.Could we, alternatively, push this
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1449?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Harwood updated LUCENE-1449:
-
Attachment: TestTransactionRollbackCapability2.java
Thanks for the pointers, Mike.
This new tes
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1424?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Busch reopened LUCENE-1424:
---
Assignee: Michael Busch (was: Michael McCandless)
Thanks Mark.
OK, I'll make a patch and
Hi Santosh,
Looks to me like you should be asking your question on the java-user list,
rather than the java-dev list -- the java-dev list is reserved for discussions
of Lucene's development, not of its use.
When you re-post to java-user, I suggest you modify your post so that it is in
the form
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1424?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12646609#action_12646609
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1424:
-
Looks like a fine solution to me. Cool tests.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1424?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12646606#action_12646606
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-1424:
---
Yeah, I understand the reason... and easy "
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1424?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12646602#action_12646602
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1424:
-
Now it returns a RangeQuery that is set for con
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1424?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12646596#action_12646596
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-1424:
---
Hmm the culprit is this line in 2.4's TestQ
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1424?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12646594#action_12646594
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-1424:
---
Since this was committed I get a test failu
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1449?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12646582#action_12646582
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1449:
Sneaky!
There is indeed a bug he
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1448?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12646574#action_12646574
]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] edited comment on LUCENE-1448 at 11/11/08 7:55 AM:
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1448?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Miller updated LUCENE-1448:
Attachment: LUCENE-1448.patch
Your tests had an off by error.
I corrected them and added the stan
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1449?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless reassigned LUCENE-1449:
--
Assignee: Michael McCandless
> IndexDeletionPolicy.delete behaves incorrectly
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1448?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12646563#action_12646563
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1448:
-
bq. Second: I can't figure out how to ask Stand
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1449?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Harwood updated LUCENE-1449:
-
Attachment: TestTransactionRollbackCapability.java
Junit test
> IndexDeletionPolicy.delete beha
IndexDeletionPolicy.delete behaves incorrectly when deleting latest generation
---
Key: LUCENE-1449
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1449
Project: Lucene - J
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1448?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12646549#action_12646549
]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] edited comment on LUCENE-1448 at 11/11/08 6:44 AM:
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1448?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12646549#action_12646549
]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] edited comment on LUCENE-1448 at 11/11/08 6:29 AM:
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1448?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12646549#action_12646549
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1448:
-
You need that +1 or you will have the subsequen
its about a searching engine
Form the search text field i'll get some test(words) & some URIs like
(http\://www.egh.org/logs/aos/tword#c_2491)
i want query to be..
soil moisture content AND ( uri1 OR uri2 OR ...uriN)
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Grouping-Of-boolean-o
its about a searching engine
Form the search text field i'll get some test(words) & some URIs like
(http\://www.egh.org/logs/aos/tword#c_2491)
i want query to be..
soil moisture content AND ( uri1 OR uri2 OR ...uriN)
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Grouping-Of-boolean-o
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1435?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12646525#action_12646525
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1435:
Could we, alternatively, push thi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1448?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-1448:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-1448.patch
First cut patch. It's not ready, though.
First: this
add getFinalOffset() to TokenStream
---
Key: LUCENE-1448
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1448
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Analysis
Reporter: Micha
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1448?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-1448:
---
Priority: Minor (was: Major)
> add getFinalOffset() to TokenStream
> --
51 matches
Mail list logo
