[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1372) Proposal: introduce more sensible sorting when a doc has multiple values for a term

2009-03-03 Thread Uwe Schindler (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1372?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12678623#action_12678623 ] Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1372: --- For TrieRange the proposed variant to sort

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 2.4.1

2009-03-03 Thread Michael Busch
+1 I tested successfully on mac os: --> lucene-2.4.1-src.tar.gz: - ant dist dist-src - ant test --> lucene-2.4.1.tar.gz - ant clean - ant compile-demo - ant demo-index-html - ant demo-index-text - ant demo-search-html - ant demo-search-text - ant jar-demo - ant war-demo -Michael On 3/2/09

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-1372) Proposal: introduce more sensible sorting when a doc has multiple values for a term

2009-03-03 Thread Paul Cowan (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1372?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Paul Cowan updated LUCENE-1372: --- Attachment: LUCENE-1372-MultiValueSorters.patch I think we're after somewhat different things here U

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1516) Integrate IndexReader with IndexWriter

2009-03-03 Thread Jason Rutherglen (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1516?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12678528#action_12678528 ] Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-1516: -- Because the patch does not flush dele

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1516) Integrate IndexReader with IndexWriter

2009-03-03 Thread Jason Rutherglen (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1516?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12678525#action_12678525 ] Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-1516: -- The IndexFileDeleter$RefCount.DecRef

RE: Iterable in FieldCacheTermsFilter (LUCENE-1487)

2009-03-03 Thread Uwe Schindler
Maybe this is the way to go until Lucene 3.0: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-718 Is it a problem to copy 1.4 rt.jar to Hudson and specify it in build.xml? - Uwe Schindler H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen http://www.thetaphi.de eMail: u...@thetaphi.de > From: Michael McCandl

Re: Iterable in FieldCacheTermsFilter (LUCENE-1487)

2009-03-03 Thread Michael McCandless
I think I'll replace it with simple String[]. Any objections? Mike Steven A Rowe wrote: FieldCacheTermsFilter on trunk uses Iterable, a language feature not present in Java 1.4. This is counter to the policy of maintaining Java 1.4 compatibility until the Lucene 3.0 release, isn't it?

Re: Iterable in FieldCacheTermsFilter (LUCENE-1487)

2009-03-03 Thread Michael McCandless
Gak, you're right! I'll fix. Mike Steven A Rowe wrote: FieldCacheTermsFilter on trunk uses Iterable, a language feature not present in Java 1.4. This is counter to the policy of maintaining Java 1.4 compatibility until the Lucene 3.0 release, isn't it? Steve --

Iterable in FieldCacheTermsFilter (LUCENE-1487)

2009-03-03 Thread Steven A Rowe
FieldCacheTermsFilter on trunk uses Iterable, a language feature not present in Java 1.4. This is counter to the policy of maintaining Java 1.4 compatibility until the Lucene 3.0 release, isn't it? Steve - To unsubscribe, e-ma

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-1516) Integrate IndexReader with IndexWriter

2009-03-03 Thread Jason Rutherglen (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1516?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jason Rutherglen updated LUCENE-1516: - Attachment: LUCENE-1516.patch * In TestConcurrentMergeScheduler.testNoWaitClose I'm seei