On 4/8/09 2:08 PM, Earwin Burrfoot wrote:
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 00:14, Michael McCandless
wrote:
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 3:46 PM, Earwin Burrfoot wrote:
Currently, when we're seeking a given Term, it does a binary search
across all term space, including terms belonging to other fi
Hi
I used ArrayUtils.getNextSize recently to expand an array to a new size.
When I read the documentation (the inline in the method), I saw this:
"The growth pattern is: 0, 4, 8, 16, 25, 35, 46, 58, 72, 88, ..."
I'm not sure if I'm misunderstanding the comment, or if there is a bug in
the imple
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 02:01, Uwe Schindler wrote:
>> >> Also, on the other topic - how hard is it to boost
>> >> TermEnum.skipTo(term) speed to IndexReader.terms(term) level? Would be
>> >> nice for TrieRangeFilter and probably some other filters.
>> > I think all that's needed is to implement Se
> >> Also, on the other topic - how hard is it to boost
> >> TermEnum.skipTo(term) speed to IndexReader.terms(term) level? Would be
> >> nice for TrieRangeFilter and probably some other filters.
> > I think all that's needed is to implement SegmentTermEnum.skipTo,
> > calling something like tis.ter
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1591?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12697233#action_12697233
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1591:
After some iterations on XERCESJ-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1590?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12697238#action_12697238
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1590:
---
bq. Since FieldInfos is per-segment, one ch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1313?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12697226#action_12697226
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-1313:
--
{quote} Still, it's synthetic. If you
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1539?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jason Rutherglen updated LUCENE-1539:
-
Attachment: LUCENE-1539.patch
Above mentioned issues fixed.
It seems a bit awkward that
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 00:14, Michael McCandless
wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 3:46 PM, Earwin Burrfoot wrote:
>
>> Currently, when we're seeking a given Term, it does a binary search
>> across all term space, including terms belonging to other fields.
>> I propose augmenting fields file with t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1284?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12697208#action_12697208
]
Otis Gospodnetic commented on LUCENE-1284:
--
One more for Felipe.
Is there a page
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1284?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12697185#action_12697185
]
Otis Gospodnetic commented on LUCENE-1284:
--
Felipe:
I took another look at this.
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 3:46 PM, Earwin Burrfoot wrote:
> Currently, when we're seeking a given Term, it does a binary search
> across all term space, including terms belonging to other fields.
> I propose augmenting fields file with two pointers (firstTerm,
> lastTerm) for each field. That reduce
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1591?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12697164#action_12697164
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1591:
So, after upgrading to xerces 2.9
Currently, when we're seeking a given Term, it does a binary search
across all term space, including terms belonging to other fields.
I propose augmenting fields file with two pointers (firstTerm,
lastTerm) for each field. That reduces range we need to search, and
instead of comparing Terms we only
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1561?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless resolved LUCENE-1561.
Resolution: Fixed
> Maybe rename Field.omitTf, and strengthen the javadocs
> -
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1575?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12697152#action_12697152
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1575:
I came across another simple sear
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1591?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12697143#action_12697143
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1591:
I'm hitting this, when trying to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1575?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12697130#action_12697130
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-1575:
of course !
> Refactoring Lucene collectors (Hit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1575?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12697124#action_12697124
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1575:
Sounds right! Wanna update the p
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1575?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12697122#action_12697122
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-1575:
Right ... so basically we're talking about change
Enable bzip compression in benchmark
Key: LUCENE-1591
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1591
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: contrib/benchmark
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1539?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12697117#action_12697117
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-1539:
bq. Can you open a new issue?
Will do.
> Improv
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1539?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12697088#action_12697088
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1539:
Enabling bzip compression sounds
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1575?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12697083#action_12697083
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1575:
bq. maxScore is only tracked in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1231?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12697076#action_12697076
]
Marvin Humphrey commented on LUCENE-1231:
-
FWIW, I think priority for document fet
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1575?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12697061#action_12697061
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-1575:
That's actually what's done in TopScoreDocCollect
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1539?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12697057#action_12697057
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-1539:
Is it also interesting to add extensions to Enwik
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1575?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12697052#action_12697052
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1575:
I wonder if we should break out t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1590?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12697034#action_12697034
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1590:
bq. In principle the Field insta
OK I'll make this change in the pending patch on LUCENE-1561.
Mike
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 8:52 AM, Mark Miller wrote:
> Yeah, you got my vote. I think this one actually felt a bit more dangerous
> when it was just called omitTf().
>
> Michael McCandless wrote:
>>
>> How about simply:
>>
>> /** E
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1590?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12697024#action_12697024
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1590:
---
{quote}
Patch looks good! All tests pass. T
Yeah, you got my vote. I think this one actually felt a bit more
dangerous when it was just called omitTf().
Michael McCandless wrote:
How about simply:
/** Expert:
*
* If set, omit term freq, positions and payloads from postings for this field.
*
* NOTE: While this option reduces storage
How about simply:
/** Expert:
*
* If set, omit term freq, positions and payloads from postings for this field.
*
* NOTE: While this option reduces storage space required in
the index,
* it also means any query requiring positional
* information, such as {...@link PhraseQuery} or {...@link
*
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1589?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12697001#action_12697001
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1589:
{quote}
The deletes are coming in
The omitTf comment is:
/** Expert:
*
* If set, omit term freq, positions and payloads from postings for
this field.
* NOTE: this is a dangerous option to enable.
* While it reduces storage space required in the index,
* it also means any query requiring positional
* infromation, su
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1590?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12696994#action_12696994
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1590:
Patch looks good! All tests pas
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1590?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless reassigned LUCENE-1590:
--
Assignee: Michael McCandless
> Stored-only fields automatically enable norms a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1231?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12696977#action_12696977
]
Earwin Burrfoot commented on LUCENE-1231:
-
I can share my design for doc loading,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1231?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12696972#action_12696972
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1231:
bq. If you e.g. want to show 5 fi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1590?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-1590:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-1590.patch
Here is the final patch. I added two tests (one for the bug itss
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1539?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12696971#action_12696971
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1539:
I think DeleteByPercentTask.java
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 7:05 PM, Jason Rutherglen
wrote:
> > I think we should keep it simple, unless we discover real perf problems
> with the current approach.
>
> Simple is good, however the indexing performance will lag because we're back
> to the indexing speed of pre ram buffer? (i.e. mergi
Hi Steve, in fact the list
of terms returned is for user consumption. From every term is possible
with a link to activate a search on the term itself and access to
document.
Annales
cafe
Cafè
zucche
Thanks
Federica
Steven A Rowe ha scritto:
On 4/7/2009 at 1:19 PM, Michael McCandless wr
43 matches
Mail list logo
