I see no problem adding these three lines for an accessor to IndexReader!
+1
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
-Original Message-
From: Grant Ingersoll [mailto:gsing...@apache.org]
Sent: Friday, May 29, 2009 11:21
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1542?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless reassigned LUCENE-1542:
--
Assignee: Michael McCandless
Lucene can incorrectly set the position of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1542?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12714684#action_12714684
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1542:
OK I plan to commit the current
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1542?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless resolved LUCENE-1542.
Resolution: Fixed
Lucene can incorrectly set the position of tokens that start a
As far as I understand the policy-making process, someone from PMC has
to start the vote, and then PMC members should, well, vote.
Without them taking action we can beep to our hearts' content
without any consequences.
On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 07:22, Shai Erera ser...@gmail.com wrote:
So ... I've
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1658?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless resolved LUCENE-1658.
Resolution: Fixed
Absorb NIOFSDirectory into FSDirectory
I think the last piece that is needed is to ask on java-user what
others think. In order to do that, I think it needs to be boiled down
to a couple paragraphs.
-Grant
On May 29, 2009, at 11:22 PM, Shai Erera wrote:
So ... I've this happen a lot of times (especially in my thesis
work) -
Actually, I think this is a common, and in fact natural/expected
occurrence in open-source. When a tricky topic is discussed, and the
opinions are often divergent, frequently the conversation never
converges to a consensus and the discussion dies. Only if
discussion reaches a semblance of
I think one conclusion that did come of this discussion was that bugs
should be fixed even if it breaks backward compatibility.
-- DM
On May 30, 2009, at 7:21 AM, Michael McCandless wrote:
Actually, I think this is a common, and in fact natural/expected
occurrence in open-source. When a
Ok, so digging back in this thread, I think the following proposals were
made (if I missed some, please add them):
1. API deprecation last *at least* one full minor release. Example: if we
deprecate an API in 2.4, we can remove it in 2.5. BUT, we are also free to
keep it there and remove it in
Makes sense!
Mike
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 5:21 PM, Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.org wrote:
Does it make sense to add isReadOnly() to IndexReader such that one can
easily introspect whether a Reader is read only?
-Grant
OK, I'll do it.
On May 30, 2009, at 8:29 AM, Michael McCandless wrote:
Makes sense!
Mike
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 5:21 PM, Grant Ingersoll
gsing...@apache.org wrote:
Does it make sense to add isReadOnly() to IndexReader such that one
can
easily introspect whether a Reader is read only?
Is there a valid use case? It seems like it might be a tricky method,
because its an IndexReader property and not the index. A user should
probably technically treat read-only/non-read-only the same because it
does not imply a different IndexReader didn't make changes/do deletes?
It doesn't
On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 1:27 PM, Mark Miller markrmil...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there a valid use case?
That was my question too... I really can't think of one.
Maybe we should leave it out until there is actually a need for it.
-Yonik
http://www.lucidimagination.com
+1
On May 29, 2009 11:27 PM, Jason Rutherglen jason.rutherg...@gmail.com
wrote:
Yeah!
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 2:21 PM, Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.org
wrote: Does it make sen...
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1614?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12714762#action_12714762
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-1614:
I was wondering if instead of adding an assert to
Trunk fails tests, FSD.open() - related
---
Key: LUCENE-1668
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1668
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Bug
Environment: MacOS 10.6, Java 1.6 64bit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1668?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12714781#action_12714781
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1668:
---
The whole LUCENE-1658 has more problems and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1658?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler reopened LUCENE-1658:
---
This issue has some more problems after committing.
And there are also inconsistencies.
I am
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1658?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler reassigned LUCENE-1658:
-
Assignee: Uwe Schindler (was: Michael McCandless)
Absorb NIOFSDirectory into
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1453?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler reopened LUCENE-1453:
---
Is this patch obsolete, if LUCENE-1658 is correctly resolved and the whole
caching from FSDir
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1658?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12714790#action_12714790
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1658:
---
This issue breaks some platforms (if
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1658?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12714793#action_12714793
]
Uwe Schindler edited comment on LUCENE-1658 at 5/30/09 4:40 PM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1658?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-1658:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-1658-take2.patch
This is a revised patch (on current trunk):
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1658?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12714795#action_12714795
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1658:
---
One comment:
The part with the reflection
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1658?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-1658:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-1658-take2.patch
New patch: Now only TestCompoundFile fails, some more
Hi,
I just stumbled upon:
http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/lucene/lucene-similarity/
Nothing since 2.2.0?!
Well, it looks like there really is nothing in contrib/similarity (the
SweetSpotSimilarity is in contrib/miscellaneous):
similarity
|-- README.txt
|-- build.xml
|--
27 matches
Mail list logo
