[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1713?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12726721#action_12726721
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1713:
---
After committing this, I will open an issue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1713?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-1713:
--
Attachment: RangeQuery.java
LUCENE-1713-backwards-branch.patch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1713?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-1713:
--
Attachment: RangeFilter.java
> Rename RangeQuery -> TermRangeQuery
> -
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1727?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12726705#action_12726705
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-1727:
--
bq. it was the entire basis for adding the Fi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1726?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jason Rutherglen updated LUCENE-1726:
-
Attachment: LUCENE-1726.patch
We don't block accessing readers in the IW.readerPool when
Mark, I agree. its not really a good "option". Just saying that trec
content that isn't ISO-8859-1 does exist :)
I like Shai's idea of having a configurable option, this is more obvious.
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 5:23 PM, Mark Miller wrote:
> bq. (For this I actually ran it with -Dfile.encoding=UTF-
bq. (For this I actually ran it with -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 to prevent this
problem), so its "configurable" already...but not obvious.
Right, I considered this option, but it changes the default encoding for the
whole JVM - probably going to be fine for running benchmark, but not ideal
in terms of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1730?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12726685#action_12726685
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-1730:
-
I'd like this to be configurable. I used this p
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1727?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12726679#action_12726679
]
Hoss Man commented on LUCENE-1727:
--
bq. It's a good reminder to avoid documenting how som
FYI, You can always create a branch from a specific revision. Don't
know if this would help.
On Jul 2, 2009, at 4:44 PM, Uwe Schindler wrote:
When doing LUCENE-1723, I restored the old state of RangeQuery & Co
from
Lucene 2.4.1 and added all new things from 2.9 to the new renamed
TermRangeQ
When doing LUCENE-1723, I restored the old state of RangeQuery & Co from
Lucene 2.4.1 and added all new things from 2.9 to the new renamed
TermRangeQuery & Co classes. Suddenly all tests in test-tag, that should
easily pass the RangeQuery tests, failed.
The source of the problem: the 2.4 backwards
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1488?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12726670#action_12726670
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-1488:
-
Earwin, you are absolutely correct.
though i w
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1730?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12726612#action_12726612
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-1730:
You're right, I didn't think in that direction. I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1708?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12726614#action_12726614
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-1708:
bq. it was a quick back and forth at the end. Got
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1730?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12726596#action_12726596
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1730:
-
The trec data you are using is ISO-8859-1. Woul
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1708?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12726593#action_12726593
]
Mark Miller edited comment on LUCENE-1708 at 7/2/09 11:05 AM:
--
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1708?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12726593#action_12726593
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1708:
-
bq. There is a paragraph in CHANGES under "Chan
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1698?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12726590#action_12726590
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1698:
-
I agree. I think we have the tools we need, we
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1730?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12726582#action_12726582
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-1730:
I don't understand - the change is in TrecContent
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1708?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12726580#action_12726580
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-1708:
There is a paragraph in CHANGES under "Changes to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1698?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12726575#action_12726575
]
Hoss Man commented on LUCENE-1698:
--
-0
(Note: this proposal is remeniscent of Grant'
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1488?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12726571#action_12726571
]
Earwin Burrfoot commented on LUCENE-1488:
-
bq. There is no morphological processin
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1708?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12726563#action_12726563
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1708:
-
I suppose, to be fair, we do mention that we mi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1713?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12726559#action_12726559
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1713:
---
After comparing the old 2.4.1 javadocs with
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1708?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12726543#action_12726543
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1708:
-
I cant find the back compat discussion on this.
Steven A Rowe wrote:
On 7/2/2009 at 9:52 AM, Mark Miller wrote:
Looks like there is a little issue - New Features is coming under Bug
Fixes. Its just kind of getting merged.
There is a space in front of "New features". Header detection requires no
leading whitespace, to distinguish h
On 7/2/2009 at 9:52 AM, Mark Miller wrote:
> Looks like there is a little issue - New Features is coming under Bug
> Fixes. Its just kind of getting merged.
There is a space in front of "New features". Header detection requires no
leading whitespace, to distinguish headers from stuff that belong
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1713?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-1713:
--
Attachment: (was: LUCENE-1713.patch)
> Rename RangeQuery -> TermRangeQuery
> -
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1713?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-1713:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-1713.patch
correct patch.
> Rename RangeQuery -> TermRangeQuery
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1713?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-1713:
--
Attachment: RangeFilter.java
RangeQuery.java
LUCENE-1713.patch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1730?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12726507#action_12726507
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1730:
-
I think that it makes sense to make the default
I hit NPE in DocInvertedPerField in the following scenario:
1) Create IndexWriter w/ a null Analyzer.
2) Add two fields to a Document, w/ a TokenStream (or one as not analyzed
and one as TokenStream, or two not analyzed).
3) Add the document to the IndexWriter.
The NPE comes from processFields (lin
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1730?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12726493#action_12726493
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-1730:
Thanks. Took me a while to think in that directio
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1730?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shai Erera updated LUCENE-1730:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-1730.patch
All tests pass.
> TrecContentSource should use a fixed encoding, rath
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1730?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12726492#action_12726492
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1730:
-
nice catch
> TrecContentSource should use a fi
TrecContentSource should use a fixed encoding, rather than system dependent
---
Key: LUCENE-1730
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1730
Project: Lucene - Java
Thats a pretty simple conflict resolution.
I think trying to lock down code while issues are in progress is
generally not a great idea. More cons than pros in my mind. Generally,
the onus is on the patch writer to continue to resolve conflicts until
they commit AFAICT.
That said, I have no p
Can somebody try to revert the change and test it on Windows?
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 4:44 PM, Robert Muir wrote:
> well then I have no idea why it doesn't fail. Except that perhaps its
> EOL-related (as Shai said), and that the failure is somehow
> platform-dependent due to newline differences b
Hrm, my work for LUCENE-1713 conflicted... I already added this to the
renamed class.
Please do not commit any changes to Range* classes before LUCENE-1713 is
resolved.
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
> -Original Mes
Looks like there is a little issue - New Features is coming under Bug
Fixes. Its just kind of getting merged.
13. LUCENE-1681: Fix infinite loop caused by a call to DocValues methods
getMinValue, getMaxValue, getAverageValue. (Simon Willnauer via Mark Miller)
New features
14. LUCENE-1411: Ad
well then I have no idea why it doesn't fail. Except that perhaps its
EOL-related (as Shai said), and that the failure is somehow
platform-dependent due to newline differences between windows and unix
(and the way these are encoded in UTF-16/stored in SVN)?
I don't do really any work with files in
Hudson runs all the tests and emails java-dev if any of them fail.
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 9:37 AM, Robert Muir (JIRA) wrote:
>
>[
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1707?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12726479#action_1272647
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1707?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12726479#action_12726479
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-1707:
-
bq. Why doesn't Hudson encounter this problem?
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1707?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12726475#action_12726475
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-1707:
so do we need to change those back to not eol-sty
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1707?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12726462#action_12726462
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-1707:
-
my code was a little out of date. I am now expe
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1728?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12726458#action_12726458
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-1728:
-
great, I like this too. any preference on names
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1728?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12726456#action_12726456
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-1728:
-
bq. Simon, are you referring to Uwe's a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1728?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12726453#action_12726453
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-1728:
-
bq. I really like this approach as it keeps the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1729?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12726415#action_12726415
]
Uwe Schindler edited comment on LUCENE-1729 at 7/2/09 2:58 AM:
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1729?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12726415#action_12726415
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1729:
---
The AUTO Sort option and FieldCache are dep
RuntimeException "no terms in field MODIFIED" in an empty index
---
Key: LUCENE-1729
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1729
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Bug
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1720?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12726382#action_12726382
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-1720:
bq. Stop() removes a thread from 1) or 2)
Minor
While we where discussing issue
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1728 (moving chinese
smart analyzer to sep. contrib) I realized that such a refactoring can
hardly be done by a contrib commiter as it would include changing docs
and ant scripts (javadoc) in /trunk etc.
I would like to co
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1728?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12726362#action_12726362
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-1728:
-
bq. After creating the new contrib, do
54 matches
Mail list logo