[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1798?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12746719#action_12746719
]
Hoss Man commented on LUCENE-1798:
--
i haven't looked at the patch, but i don't think you
See http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Lucene-trunk/927/changes
Changes:
[uschindler] Fix small initialization bug in TermAttributeImpl.copyTo()
[uschindler] Fix small initialization bug in Token.copyTo()
[uschindler] LUCENE-1825: Another one :(
[uschindler] LUCENE-1825: Additional inco
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1843?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-1843:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-1843.patch
- Small updates
- forget conversion of two filters in contrib/me
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1843?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12746694#action_12746694
]
Uwe Schindler edited comment on LUCENE-1843 at 8/23/09 4:35 PM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1843?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-1843:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-1843.patch
Now the right file.
Will commit tomorrow.
> Convert some tests
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1843?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-1843:
--
Attachment: (was: LUCENE-1846.patch)
> Convert some tests to new TokenStream API, better s
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1843?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-1843:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-1846.patch
Patch that makes all contrib/analyzer tests that work with Token
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1837?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Miller updated LUCENE-1837:
Attachment: LUCENE-1837.patch
> Remove Searcher from Weight#explain
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1837?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12746671#action_12746671
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1837:
-
I'm just going to revert the Searcher here - a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1847?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Miller updated LUCENE-1847:
Description:
PhraseQuery uses IndexReader in explainfor top level stats - as mentioned by
Mike Mc
PhraseQuery uses IndexReader specific docFreqs in its explain
-
Key: LUCENE-1847
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1847
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Bug
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1821?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Miller updated LUCENE-1821:
Affects Version/s: (was: 3.1)
2.9
Fix Version/s: 3.1
whoops - t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1821?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Miller updated LUCENE-1821:
Affects Version/s: (was: 2.9)
3.1
Yeah, no problem - tag whatever you'd
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1845?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Willnauer updated LUCENE-1845:
Attachment: LUCENE-1845.txt
this time with ASF licence grant
> if the build fails to down
On Aug 23, 2009, at 2:06 PM, Simon Willnauer wrote:
On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 7:38 PM, Robert Muir wrote:
just wanted to mention this (i honestly don't have any opinion
either way):
Right, this (you can jump to 2.9, fix all deprecations, then easily
move to 3.0 and see no deprecations) is my
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1845?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Willnauer updated LUCENE-1845:
Attachment: LUCENE-1845.txt
Mike, I attached a new patch. The old one had some problems wi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1821?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12746662#action_12746662
]
Tim Smith commented on LUCENE-1821:
---
can i at least argue for it being tagged for 3.0 or
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1821?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Miller updated LUCENE-1821:
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.9)
I'm going to push it out for now. Of course, feel free to argue for
Simon Willnauer wrote:
>
> Having 3.0
> with 1.4 back-compat and then 3.1 which get rid of this would confuse
> users.
>
> simon
>
>
If that was really a concern (and we decided to jump to 3.0), we could
just say this 3.0 release requires Java 1.5 - 3.0 and beyond can still
be considered Java 1
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1837?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Miller updated LUCENE-1837:
Description: Explain needs to calculate corpus wide stats in a way that is
consistent with MultiSe
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1837?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Miller updated LUCENE-1837:
Lucene Fields: [New, Patch Available] (was: [New])
Summary: Remove Searcher from explain
On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 7:38 PM, Robert Muir wrote:
> just wanted to mention this (i honestly don't have any opinion either way):
>
>> Right, this (you can jump to 2.9, fix all deprecations, then easily
>> move to 3.0 and see no deprecations) is my understanding too, but I
>> don't see what's parti
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1837?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Miller updated LUCENE-1837:
Attachment: LUCENE-1837.patch
Okay, very rough patch. No concern for back compat or anything.
Add
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1845?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12746646#action_12746646
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-1845:
-
bq. OK so this is good to go. Can you c
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1821?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12746645#action_12746645
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-1821:
--
bq. I say we push this issue from 2.9 for now
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1821?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12746644#action_12746644
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-1821:
--
bq. This is a good point... Yonik, how [in ge
just wanted to mention this (i honestly don't have any opinion either way):
> Right, this (you can jump to 2.9, fix all deprecations, then easily
> move to 3.0 and see no deprecations) is my understanding too, but I
> don't see what's particularly useful about that. It does produce a
> Lucene rel
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1821?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12746643#action_12746643
]
Tim Smith commented on LUCENE-1821:
---
Lot of new comments to respond to :)
will try to co
I'm still +1 on calling this 3.0 as I was before when you mentioned it.
Its a wakeup call that the upgrade is a bit major in certain areas.
In either case - 3.0 is more representative of what this release is IMO.
I also think we should allow new features in 3.0 if we release this as 2.9.
- Mark
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1845?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12746642#action_12746642
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1845:
Aha, you're right! Sorry about t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1845?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12746640#action_12746640
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-1845:
-
Weird! - I changed the URL to http://fo
Right, this (you can jump to 2.9, fix all deprecations, then easily
move to 3.0 and see no deprecations) is my understanding too, but I
don't see what's particularly useful about that. It does produce a
Lucene release that has zero deprecated APIs (assuming we remove all
of them), but I don't thin
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1845?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Willnauer reassigned LUCENE-1845:
---
Assignee: Simon Willnauer
> if the build fails to download JARs for contrib/db, just
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1821?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12746639#action_12746639
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1821:
-
Cool - I don't like it much either.
I say we p
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1843?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12746638#action_12746638
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1843:
---
>From a private mail with Robert Muir:
yes
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1843?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler reopened LUCENE-1843:
---
There are some more tests, that fail with onlyUseNewAPI in contrib/analyzers.
> Convert some te
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1821?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12746635#action_12746635
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1821:
bq. one used a cached DocIdSet cr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1821?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12746636#action_12746636
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1821:
Net/net, I'm still nervous about
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1821?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12746634#action_12746634
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1821:
bq. Using a per-segment cache wil
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1821?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12746633#action_12746633
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1821:
bq. one used an int[] ord index (
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1837?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12746632#action_12746632
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1837:
bq. If a Sim didn't do those calc
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1837?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12746631#action_12746631
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1837:
-
And also ;)
If a Sim didn't do those calculati
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1837?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12746629#action_12746629
]
Mark Miller edited comment on LUCENE-1837 at 8/23/09 9:29 AM:
--
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1821?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12746630#action_12746630
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-1821:
--
bq. Filter.getDocIdSet(IndexSearcher, IndexRe
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1837?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12746629#action_12746629
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1837:
-
Right - I was just writing to that affect. If w
+1
Mike
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 4:39 PM, Steven A Rowe wrote:
> Tangent: Now that contrib/CHANGES.txt is getting regular updates, I think it
> would make sense to generate a Changes.html corresponding to its contents, in
> the same way that the core CHANGES.txt is transformed.
>
> Looks like th
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1837?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12746628#action_12746628
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1837:
bq. I don't like is that this inf
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1821?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12746625#action_12746625
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1821:
bq. for string sorting, it makes
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1837?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12746624#action_12746624
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1837:
-
bq. Really the Weight should gather & hold all
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1821?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12746623#action_12746623
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1821:
Tim, one option might be to subcl
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1837?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12746622#action_12746622
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1837:
bq. It won't revert the whole iss
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1837?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12746621#action_12746621
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1837:
-
It won't revert the whole issue. Weight still a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1837?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12746619#action_12746619
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1837:
So Mark this will revert LUCENE-1
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1845?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12746618#action_12746618
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1845:
Hmm -- I tried applying the patch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1821?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12746617#action_12746617
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1821:
bq. You want to weigh in again Mi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1836?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12746616#action_12746616
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-1836:
-
Adriano, also as I noted in LUCENE-1846, the ol
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1821?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12746613#action_12746613
]
Tim Smith commented on LUCENE-1821:
---
bq. thats a tough bunch of code to decide to spread
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1798?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-1798:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-1798.patch
Attached patch. I added get/setInfoStream to FieldCac
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1846?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12746611#action_12746611
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-1846:
-
Uwe, thanks for bringing this issue up!
we st
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1821?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12746608#action_12746608
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1821:
-
bq. well, you could go the route similar to the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1821?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12746607#action_12746607
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1821:
-
You want to weigh in again Mike ? You still hav
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1844?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12746605#action_12746605
]
Mark Miller edited comment on LUCENE-1844 at 8/23/09 7:23 AM:
--
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1844?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12746605#action_12746605
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1844:
-
Should also be able to speed up TestBooleanMinS
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1821?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12746600#action_12746600
]
Tim Smith commented on LUCENE-1821:
---
well, you could go the route similar to the 2.4 Tok
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1845?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Willnauer updated LUCENE-1845:
Attachment: LUCENE-1845.txt
I set the property "ignoreerrors" to true on the get task. Thi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1846?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12746579#action_12746579
]
Uwe Schindler edited comment on LUCENE-1846 at 8/23/09 2:51 AM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1846?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-1846:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-1846.patch
Patch.
The changes in DateField may affect users with very stra
More Locale problems in Lucene
--
Key: LUCENE-1846
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1846
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Other
Reporter: Uwe Schindler
if the build fails to download JARs for contrib/db, just skip its tests
---
Key: LUCENE-1845
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1845
Project: Lucene - Java
Is
Looks like this build failed because downloads.osafoundation.org is
down (we download BDB JARs from there, for contrib/db).
This has happened a good number of times now... it'd be great to fix
the contrib/db/build.xml to just skip the tests when this download
fails. I'll open an issue but I'm not
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1826?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Busch resolved LUCENE-1826.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Committed revision 806942.
> All Tokenizer implementations should have co
71 matches
Mail list logo
