[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1785?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12789985#action_12789985
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-1785:
--
We probably need to figure out a way
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2026?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12789971#action_12789971
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2026:
--
I think large scale NRT installations
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2146?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
wang updated LUCENE-2146:
-
Attachment: DisjunctionMaxQueryTest.java
> DisjunctionMaxQuery has incorrect hashCode() implementation
> --
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2146?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
wang updated LUCENE-2146:
-
Attachment: (was: LUCENE-2146.patch)
> DisjunctionMaxQuery has incorrect hashCode() implementation
> --
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2146?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
wang updated LUCENE-2146:
-
Attachment: LUCENE-2146.patch
this patch can fix this bug.
> DisjunctionMaxQuery has incorrect hashCode() imple
Erick it might be a gremlin on my computer or my brain...
also i think i was inadvertently using different JVM's for running ant test
(sometimes java 5/64bit sometimes 6/32bit). this is because i was doing
something with forrest and changed my JAVA_HOME in one shell window.
so i'm going to run 100
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2126?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12789946#action_12789946
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-2126:
---
{quote}
So first, can we perhaps name them
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2126?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12789944#action_12789944
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-2126:
---
{quote}
What does a "normal" user do with a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2026?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12789905#action_12789905
]
Marvin Humphrey commented on LUCENE-2026:
-
> I think that's a poor default (trades
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2126?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12789901#action_12789901
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-2126:
-
> I disagree with you here: introducing DataInp
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2089?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12789900#action_12789900
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2089:
-
bq. You wrote that some parts of the code are "
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2146?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-2146:
---
Fix Version/s: 3.1
> DisjunctionMaxQuery has incorrect hashCode() implementation
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2146?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12789899#action_12789899
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2146:
By any chance do you also have a
Thanks for reporting -- we should always call attention to random
failures in our various test envs -- such distributed testing casts a
very wide net.
It looks like this is the same failure hit a while back by the nightly build:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2118
I'm not very
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2126?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12789895#action_12789895
]
Marvin Humphrey commented on LUCENE-2126:
-
> I disagree with you here: introducing
I was running the whole ant-clean-test in a loop last night for
LUCENE-2122 and had this error in IndexWriter occur once
in 30+ runs. I now there has been some work on spurious
failures here lately and thought I'd add this on the chance
it'd help anyone tracking this issue. Didn't see a JIRA...
I
Uwe:
Thanks, I'll remember that in the future
On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 5:31 AM, Uwe Schindler wrote:
> Hi Erick,
>
>
>
> sadly, the eMail reply to JIRA issues does not work for mails sent to this
> mailing list (because the list overrides reply-to header so JIRA does not
> get the answer)
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2104?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12789894#action_12789894
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-2104:
Thanks for the comments. I proposed this above:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2089?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12789885#action_12789885
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-2089:
---
You wrote that some parts of the code are "
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2104?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12789876#action_12789876
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-2104:
---
+1 on exception.
The problem: NativeFSLock
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2154?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12789875#action_12789875
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-2154:
---
I tried to implement that with JDK's reflec
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2104?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12789873#action_12789873
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2104:
Seems like two things are being d
Hi Erick,
sadly, the eMail reply to JIRA issues does not work for mails sent to this
mailing list (because the list overrides reply-to header so JIRA does not
get the answer). If you answer only on the ML, we loss those comments in the
issue.
Uwe
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63
23 matches
Mail list logo
