[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2215?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Grant Ingersoll reassigned LUCENE-2215:
---
Assignee: Grant Ingersoll
> paging collector
>
>
>
separate chararrayset interface from impl
-
Key: LUCENE-2227
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2227
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Task
Components: Analysis
Affects Ve
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1410?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12802235#action_12802235
]
Renaud Delbru commented on LUCENE-1410:
---
On another aspect, why is the PFOR/FOR is e
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1410?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12802235#action_12802235
]
Renaud Delbru edited comment on LUCENE-1410 at 1/19/10 1:10 PM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2111?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-2111:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-2111.patch
Attached patch w/ various fixes:
- Switch over payl
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2215?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12802276#action_12802276
]
Adam Heinz commented on LUCENE-2215:
Awesome, thanks! I'll schedule some time in the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2213?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-2213:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-2213.patch
New patch, just renaming to ArrayUtil.oversize.
> Sma
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1410?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12802335#action_12802335
]
Paul Elschot commented on LUCENE-1410:
--
The only reason why the number of compressed
Hello Frederic,
I'm CCing java-dev@lucene.apache.org as Michael McCandless has been
very helpful on IRC in discussing the ThreadLocal implication, and it
would be nice you could provide first-hand information.
There's a good reading to start from at
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1383
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2217?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12802449#action_12802449
]
Paul Elschot commented on LUCENE-2217:
--
Btw. shouldn't IndexInput.bytes also be reall
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2217?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12802456#action_12802456
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2217:
bq. Btw. shouldn't IndexInput.byt
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2217?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12802510#action_12802510
]
Paul Elschot commented on LUCENE-2217:
--
Well, it's not that I'm searching, but I'll p
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2205?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12802535#action_12802535
]
Deepak commented on LUCENE-2205:
Hi Aaron
I hope you will be able to post the files today
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1990?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12802542#action_12802542
]
Toke Eskildsen commented on LUCENE-1990:
Introducing yet another level of indirect
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1488?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12802568#action_12802568
]
Vilaythong Southavilay commented on LUCENE-1488:
I am developing an IR sys
The javadocs for IndexSearcher in Lucene 3.0.0 read: "For performance
reasons it is recommended to open only one IndexSearcher and use it for all
of your searches."
However, to use NRT, it seems I have to do this for every search, which
contradicts the advice above:
IndexSearcher myIndexSear
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1488?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12802596#action_12802596
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-1488:
-
Thanks for sharing those results! Yes the bigra
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2205?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Aaron McCurry updated LUCENE-2205:
--
Attachment: TermInfosReaderIndexDefault.java
TermInfosReaderIndex.java
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2205?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Aaron McCurry updated LUCENE-2205:
--
Attachment: TermInfosReaderIndexSmall.java
Here's the last file. I have also back patched 3.0
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2205?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12802632#action_12802632
]
Aaron McCurry edited comment on LUCENE-2205 at 1/20/10 2:57 AM:
J,
The javadocs are illustrating there's no need to create new
IndexSearchers for each query.
Jason
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 5:04 PM, jchang wrote:
>
> The javadocs for IndexSearcher in Lucene 3.0.0 read: "For performance
> reasons it is recommended to open only one IndexSearcher and use it for
I think the question here really is the cost of creating new IndexReader
instances per query.
Calling IndexWriter.getReader() for each query has shown to be expensive
from our benchmark and previous discussions.
-John
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 8:12 PM, Jason Rutherglen <
jason.rutherg...@gmail.com
22 matches
Mail list logo
