Hi,
If we are able to create a Field using a BufferedReader, why not do the same
for the Term as well ?
I am trying to implement Lucene for a small set of source files, where the
entire source is the value for a Field named 'source'. Creating the field
was easy because there is a constructor for F
aaarghhh
You are right, Michael. Apologies for the stupid question.
Regards,
Nags.
On Dec 1, 2007 3:07 PM, Michael McCandless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> If you call .stringValue() you should get just that string?
>
> (You are now calling .toString()).
>
t; They are not present in 2.2.
>
> You can pull the nightly trunk build JAR from here:
>
>
> http://lucene.zones.apache.org:8080/hudson/job/Lucene-Nightly/290/artifact/artifacts/
>
> (that's this AM's build). But beware that it could have bugs (it's not
> yet
&g
Hi,
I am having lucene-core-2.2.0.jar in my CLASSPATH. I do NOT see the method
setRAMBufferSizeMB method and the field DEFAULT_RAM_BUFFER_SIZE_MB missing
from IndexWriter class. I looked into the source also and sure enough, these
items do not exist.
Is this a download issue ?
Regards,
Nags.
Hi,
I am working with demo and I am displaying the search results as :
Hits ht = is.search(q);
for (int i = 0; i <= ht.length(); i++) {
Document hitDoc = ht.doc(i);
queryResult.add(hitDoc.getField("name").toString() + "~"
+ hitDoc.getField("date").toString());
System.out.println(que
