what other libraries do is have a 'core' or a 'common' bit.. which is
what the lucene library really is.
looking at http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/ today I see that
nearly, but it's called 'java'.
maybe just renaming 'java' to 'core' or 'common' (hadoop uses common)
might make sense
+1
I'd like to see the IRC logs added to things like
http://search-lucene.com/ and
http://www.lucidimagination.com/search/?q=IRCSearch=Search
http://www.lucidimagination.com/search/?q=IRCSearch=Search
while it might not be great for decision making.. it is amazing for
helping debug common
Babak Farhang wrote:
Most of all, I'm trying to communicate an *idea* which itself cannot
be encumbered by any license, anyway. But if you want to incorporate
some of this code into an asf project, I'd be happy to also release it
under the apache license. Hope the license I chose for my project
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-965?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12651332#action_12651332
]
Ian Holsman commented on LUCENE-965:
It's a bit late over here, but when I try to apply
If no one objects (I don't think it's too late)
would you mind a GSOC project to implement BM25 relevancy/scoring?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Grant Ingersoll wrote:
2. How does Lucene search compare w/ using built in DB search? Has
anyone done a study comparing Lucene performance/quality to the likes
of MySQL/Postgres/Oracle? Related question is always on how to
integrate the two.
Hi Grant.
when we initially investigated
On 17/06/2006, at 6:36 AM, Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
Hi Simon,
- GData oversion page describes the auth with send a cookie/token,
save in server-side, and then expect it from the client on
subsequent requests (paraphrased). That sounds fine to me. I
don't think you need to worry about
On 02/06/2006, at 9:37 AM, Simon Willnauer wrote:
The biggest problem with the lucene storage is to achieve a
transactional state. Imagine the following scenario:
An update request comes in. - the entry to update will be added to
the lucene writer who writes the update. But another delete
sorry..
your right.
Rel 1 was released in april 2005, Rel 4 (april 2006) was the one
which made it the default.
On 28/05/2006, at 8:01 AM, karl wettin wrote:
On Sun, 2006-05-28 at 07:59 +1000, Ian Holsman wrote:
OS/X just released their 1.5 version about 2-3 months ago.
I've been
