> Furthermore, I think it would
> encourage Lucene users/developers to think about relevance as much as
> we think about speed.
+1
However I think it would be much better to start by making informal
approaches as you suggest - the open letter seems to me to be
appropriate only as a last resort.
Hadoop recently removed all @author tags:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-1147.
Tom
On 05/07/07, Grant Ingersoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Solr just suggested (http://www.mail-archive.com/solr-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg04883.html) that they remove Author tags for
a variety of good rea
On 8/30/05, Ken Krugler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >Daniel Naber wrote:
> >
> >>On Monday 29 August 2005 19:56, Ken Krugler wrote:
> >>
> >>>"Lucene writes strings as a VInt representing the length of the
> >>>string in Java chars (UTF-16 code units), followed by the character
> >>>data."
> >>
are there instead of here.
>
> Erik
>
>
> On Aug 17, 2005, at 5:58 PM, Tom White wrote:
>
> > In case subscribers to this list missed it, my article on how to add a
> > "did you mean" facility to Lucene searches was published last week:
>
In case subscribers to this list missed it, my article on how to add a
"did you mean" facility to Lucene searches was published last week:
http://today.java.net/pub/a/today/2005/08/09/didyoumean.html.
Regards,
Tom
-
To unsubscri
This might be what you're looing for: http://computefarm.jini.org/.
Cheers,
Tom
On 8/4/05, Cheolgoo Kang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yeah, it would be great if we had a Directory subclass like
> MapReduceDirectory.
>
> I'm looking for the ComputeFarm that is implemented a distributed
> parall
