Re: Proposal about Version API relaxation

2010-04-15 Thread jm
Not sure if plain users are allowed/encouraged to post in this list, but wanted to mention (just an opinion from a happy user), as other users have, that not all of us can reindex just like that. It would not be 10 min for one of our installations for sure... First, i would need to implement some

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2215) paging collector

2010-02-12 Thread jm (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2215?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12833024#action_12833024 ] jm commented on LUCENE-2215: Kudos Aaron, this is cool for what I need. I just integrated

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-556) MatchAllDocsQuery, MultiSearcher and a custom HitCollector throwing exception

2006-04-27 Thread jm (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-556?page=comments#action_12376758 ] jm commented on LUCENE-556: --- I used a custom version and my queries work now, but I am not sure wether this is ok...it's mostly an easy shot I took: public class

[jira] Created: (LUCENE-556) MatchAllDocsQuery, MultiSearcher and a custom HitCollector throwing exception

2006-04-26 Thread jm (JIRA)
Components: Search Versions: 1.9 Environment: xp sp2, jdk1.5 Reporter: jm Priority: Minor I have encountered an issue with lucene1.9.1. It involves MatchAllDocsQuery, MultiSearcher and a custom HitCollector. The following code throws java.lang.UnsupportedOperationException. If I