Key, I think we have the practice to keep issues in Fixed state (not Closed). I'm not sure if closing them does any harm or not in terms of JIRA workflow/figuring out what was fixed/reports and such...anyone knows?
Otis -- Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch ----- Original Message ---- > From: Kay Kay (JIRA) <j...@apache.org> > To: o...@apache.org > Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2009 10:06:05 AM > Subject: [jira] Closed: (SOLR-954) SolrQuery - better cross-referential > documentation / fix inconsistent cross-reference links . > > > [ > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-954?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel > > ] > > Kay Kay closed SOLR-954. > ------------------------ > > > Thanks Otis. > > > SolrQuery - better cross-referential documentation / fix inconsistent > cross-reference links . > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > Key: SOLR-954 > > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-954 > > Project: Solr > > Issue Type: Improvement > > Components: documentation > > Affects Versions: 1.3 > > Environment: Tomcat 6, Java 6 > > Reporter: Kay Kay > > Assignee: Otis Gospodnetic > > Priority: Minor > > Fix For: 1.4 > > > > Attachments: SOLR-954.patch, SOLR-954.patch > > > > Original Estimate: 3h > > Remaining Estimate: 3h > > > > SolrQuery methods need quite a bit of documentation as the javadoc appears > > to > be blank at the moment and comments for some deprecated methods point to > non-existent methods. Patch relevant to documentation available herewith. > > -- > This message is automatically generated by JIRA. > - > You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
