[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1142?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12626142#action_12626142
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-1142:
--
I just tried updating Solr... I guess this
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1142?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12625108#action_12625108
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on LUCENE-1142:
-
+1
--
Grant
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1142?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12624001#action_12624001
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on LUCENE-1142:
-
One other thought on this, and I think
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1142?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12623688#action_12623688
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on LUCENE-1142:
-
Karl,
This is marked as 2.4, but your
: Do we require the contrib to adhere to the same back compatibility rules as
: trunk? I don't know that it has been established. Thoughts? Analysis is a
: pretty tricky one, as compared to the other packages.
we discussed this a little while back and put it on the wiki...
All contribs are
Chris Hostetter skrev:
...personally i think the analysis contrib should have the same compat
reqruitements as the core given how heavily used it is.
In this specific case it is possible to introduce the new stemmers via
one method and leave the old stemmers accessable using old methods.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1142?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12584119#action_12584119
]
Karl Wettin commented on LUCENE-1142:
-
I propose for this patch to be included in
