[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1373) Most of the contributed Analyzers suffer from invalid recognition of acronyms.

2009-07-09 Thread Rob ten Hove (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1373?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12729181#action_12729181 ] Rob ten Hove commented on LUCENE-1373: -- @Mark, thanks for your reply on my question.

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1373) Most of the contributed Analyzers suffer from invalid recognition of acronyms.

2009-07-05 Thread Mark Lassau (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1373?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12727390#action_12727390 ] Mark Lassau commented on LUCENE-1373: - @Rob This issue is about how Lucene parses ACR

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1373) Most of the contributed Analyzers suffer from invalid recognition of acronyms.

2009-07-01 Thread Rob ten Hove (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1373?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12725972#action_12725972 ] Rob ten Hove commented on LUCENE-1373: -- Is it possible that when a property has a val

Re: [jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1373) Most of the contributed Analyzers suffer from invalid recognition of acronyms.

2008-09-03 Thread Shai Erera
I think we should distinguish between what is a bug and what is an attempt of the tokenizer to produce a meaningful token. When the tokenizer outputs a HOST or ACRONYM token type, there's nothing that prevents you from putting a filter after the tokenizer that will use a UIMA Annotator (for example

Re: [jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1373) Most of the contributed Analyzers suffer from invalid recognition of acronyms.

2008-09-03 Thread Mark Lassau
Grant Ingersoll (JIRA) wrote: Of course, it's still a bit weird, b/c in your case the type value is going to be set to ACRONYM, when your example is clearly not one. This suggests to me that the grammar needs to be revisited, but that can wait until 3.0 I believe. Grant, not sure what you

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1373) Most of the contributed Analyzers suffer from invalid recognition of acronyms.

2008-09-03 Thread Grant Ingersoll (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1373?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12627990#action_12627990 ] Grant Ingersoll commented on LUCENE-1373: - I think you should mirror what is done

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1373) Most of the contributed Analyzers suffer from invalid recognition of acronyms.

2008-09-02 Thread Mark Lassau (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1373?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12627903#action_12627903 ] Mark Lassau commented on LUCENE-1373: - Had a closer look at the code, including change

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1373) Most of the contributed Analyzers suffer from invalid recognition of acronyms.

2008-09-02 Thread Mark Lassau (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1373?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12627875#action_12627875 ] Mark Lassau commented on LUCENE-1373: - Causes JIRA issue [JRA-15484|http://jira.atlass

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1373) Most of the contributed Analyzers suffer from invalid recognition of acronyms.

2008-09-02 Thread Mark Lassau (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1373?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12627873#action_12627873 ] Mark Lassau commented on LUCENE-1373: - I would be willing to contribute a patch to mak