Re: [jira] Commented: (LUCENE-472) Some fixes to let gcj 3.4.2 build lucene using ant gcj target

2008-01-18 Thread Michele Bini
Michele Bini wrote: [...] Unrelated to this: can somebody confirm that, in 2.3.0-rc3, building the gcj examples actually works? gcj 4.2.2 reports lots of unknown symbols at link time. Please, ignore this: it was an error on my part. Sorry for the noise, Michele -

Re: [jira] Commented: (LUCENE-472) Some fixes to let gcj 3.4.2 build lucene using ant gcj target

2008-01-18 Thread Michele Bini
Grant Ingersoll (JIRA) wrote: Is this still an issue? Haven't heard much from GCJ people in a while... As I reported in jira this is no longer an issue, so I closed it. I should have looked at it some time ago but I actually forgot having filed the bug. Unrelated to this: can somebody conf

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-472) Some fixes to let gcj 3.4.2 build lucene using ant gcj target

2008-01-18 Thread Michele Bini (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-472?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12560479#action_12560479 ] Michele Bini commented on LUCENE-472: - I just tried to build lucene 2.3.0-rc3 with gcj

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-472) Some fixes to let gcj 3.4.2 build lucene using ant gcj target

2008-01-18 Thread Grant Ingersoll (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-472?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12560399#action_12560399 ] Grant Ingersoll commented on LUCENE-472: Is this still an issue? Haven't heard muc