[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-504?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12773421#action_12773421
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-504:
--
Nadav:
I suggest to keep Lucene's PriorityQueu
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-504?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12773402#action_12773402
]
Nadav Har'El commented on LUCENE-504:
-
Hi Uwe, I think that even though PriorityQueue d
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-504?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12773098#action_12773098
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-504:
--
We had a discussion about that in another issu
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-504?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12773001#action_12773001
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-504:
---
Since 3.0 is now on Java 1.5, can't
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-504?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12772479#action_12772479
]
Ivan Rozhnov commented on LUCENE-504:
-
Hi guys,
It seems to me that problem is still o
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-504?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12731744#action_12731744
]
Florian Waltersdorfer commented on LUCENE-504:
--
Hi,
something along the line
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-504?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12657602#action_12657602
]
George Papas commented on LUCENE-504:
-
Hi,
This is still an issue in 2.4.0. I know t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-504?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12624345#action_12624345
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-504:
This really should be fixed. I agree with Nadav, t
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-504?page=comments#action_12419624 ]
Doron Cohen commented on LUCENE-504:
I think it makes sense to separate here between efficiency and correctness.
The proposed fix above deals with efficiency, and maybe it
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-504?page=comments#action_12418446 ]
Nadav Har'El commented on LUCENE-504:
-
Hi Otis, you did not comment on my patch (fuzzyquery.patch), which I think
solves your objections to Doron's previous patch. Do you
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-504?page=comments#action_12416168 ]
Nadav Har'El commented on LUCENE-504:
-
Hi Doron and Otis,
My view is that this bug is a problem in FuzzyQuery, not in PriorityQueue or
BooleanQuery. It is the caller's du
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-504?page=comments#action_12415825 ]
Doron Cohen commented on LUCENE-504:
Yes this is correct - e.g. on a win32 machine with 2GB RAM, SUN 1.5 JRE would
accept up to Xmx1470m and in that case you could set the
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-504?page=comments#action_12415807 ]
Otis Gospodnetic commented on LUCENE-504:
-
I imagine the limit will depend on how big of a heap you allow, no? What
happens if you increase the heap size drammaticall
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-504?page=comments#action_12415800 ]
Doron Cohen commented on LUCENE-504:
LuceneFAQ item"Why am I getting a TooManyClauses exception?"
suggests:"use BooleanQuery.setMaxClauseCount(Integer.MAX_VALUE)
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-504?page=comments#action_12414438 ]
Paul Borgermans commented on LUCENE-504:
Here the same problem, used a MultiFieldQueryParser in combination with fuzzy
search which triggered the exception
> FuzzyQue
15 matches
Mail list logo