[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-528?page=comments#action_12443978 ]
Ning Li commented on LUCENE-528:
I'll submit a patch next week.
> Optimization for IndexWriter.addIndexes()
> -
>
>
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-528?page=comments#action_12443940 ]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-528:
-
> Algorithm looks good?
Yep, looks good.
A possible optimization *far* down the road for segments that need copying
c
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-528?page=comments#action_12443911 ]
Ning Li commented on LUCENE-528:
> I think you need to ensure that no segments from the source index "S" remain
> after the call, right?
Correct. And thanks!
So
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-528?page=comments#action_12443841 ]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-528:
-
I think you need to ensure that no segments from the source index "S" remain
after the call, right?
> Optimization for
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-528?page=comments#action_12443723 ]
Ning Li commented on LUCENE-528:
We want a robust algorithm for the version of addIndexes() which
does not call optimize().
The robustness can be expressed as the
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-528?page=comments#action_12428478 ]
Ning Li commented on LUCENE-528:
In an email thread titled "LUCENE-528 and 565", I described a weakness of the
proposed solution:
"I'm totally for a version of ad
