[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-550) InstanciatedIndex - faster but memory consuming index

2006-11-21 Thread wolfgang hoschek (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-550?page=comments#action_12451817 ] wolfgang hoschek commented on LUCENE-550: - All Lucene unit tests have been adapted to work with my alternate index. Everything but proximity queries

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-550) InstanciatedIndex - faster but memory consuming index

2006-11-21 Thread Karl Wettin (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-550?page=comments#action_12451763 ] Karl Wettin commented on LUCENE-550: wolfgang hoschek [21/Nov/06 10:22 AM] Other question: when running the driver in test mode (checking for equality of

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-550) InstanciatedIndex - faster but memory consuming index

2006-11-21 Thread wolfgang hoschek (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-550?page=comments#action_12451768 ] wolfgang hoschek commented on LUCENE-550: - Ok. That means a basic test passes. For some more exhaustive tests, run all the queries in

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-550) InstanciatedIndex - faster but memory consuming index

2006-11-21 Thread Karl Wettin (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-550?page=comments#action_12451777 ] Karl Wettin commented on LUCENE-550: diff=-0.024093388, query=term*, scoreII=0.024093388, scoreRAM=0.024093388 Actually, diff != 0 means the test fails,

Re: [jira] Commented: (LUCENE-550) InstanciatedIndex - faster but memory consuming index

2006-11-21 Thread karl wettin
21 nov 2006 kl. 21.52 skrev wolfgang hoschek (JIRA): For some more exhaustive tests, run all the queries I'm at home now. Will continue tomorrow. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail:

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-550) InstanciatedIndex - faster but memory consuming index

2006-11-21 Thread Karl Wettin (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-550?page=comments#action_12451780 ] Karl Wettin commented on LUCENE-550: wolfgang hoschek [21/Nov/06 12:50 PM] Ok. That means a basic test passes. For some more exhaustive tests, run all the

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-550) InstanciatedIndex - faster but memory consuming index

2006-11-21 Thread Karl Wettin (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-550?page=comments#action_12451726 ] Karl Wettin commented on LUCENE-550: Here is what I just sent to Wolgang. I've adapted his bench test case to also work with InstantiatedIndex. It is worth

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-550) InstanciatedIndex - faster but memory consuming index

2006-11-21 Thread wolfgang hoschek (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-550?page=comments#action_12451731 ] wolfgang hoschek commented on LUCENE-550: - Other question: when running the driver in test mode (checking for equality of query results against

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-550) InstanciatedIndex - faster but memory consuming index

2006-11-21 Thread wolfgang hoschek (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-550?page=comments#action_12451730 ] wolfgang hoschek commented on LUCENE-550: - What's the benchmark configuration? For example, is throughput bounded by indexing or querying? Measuring N

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-550) InstanciatedIndex - faster but memory consuming index

2006-07-26 Thread Karl Wettin (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-550?page=comments#action_12423710 ] Karl Wettin commented on LUCENE-550: Performance from live environemt: * 150,000 documents, average size is 2K. * Consumes 2x the memory of a RAMDirectory.

Re: [jira] Commented: (LUCENE-550) InstanciatedIndex - faster but memory consuming index

2006-07-26 Thread Otis Gospodnetic
says hi to your mom. Otis - Original Message From: Karl Wettin (JIRA) [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2006 4:05:21 AM Subject: [jira] Commented: (LUCENE-550) InstanciatedIndex - faster but memory consuming index [ http://issues.apache.org/jira

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-550) InstanciatedIndex - faster but memory consuming index

2006-07-26 Thread Dejan Nenov (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-550?page=comments#action_12423719 ] Dejan Nenov commented on LUCENE-550: Can we please get the class diagrams in PDF format - the PNGs are so tny - they are undreadable :( InstanciatedIndex -

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-550) InstanciatedIndex - faster but memory consuming index

2006-07-26 Thread Karl Wettin (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-550?page=comments#action_12423720 ] Karl Wettin commented on LUCENE-550: Can we please get the class diagrams in PDF format - the PNGs are so tny - they are undreadable :( Shamless promotion:

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-550) InstanciatedIndex - faster but memory consuming index

2006-07-26 Thread Dejan Nenov (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-550?page=comments#action_12423731 ] Dejan Nenov commented on LUCENE-550: And whil ewe wait - may we please have highres PNGs - so that the zoomed-in versions are a little more readable?

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-550) InstanciatedIndex - faster but memory consuming index

2006-07-21 Thread Karl Wettin (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-550?page=comments#action_12422795 ] Karl Wettin commented on LUCENE-550: In order to find the norm-error I ported all test cases. I'm sorry to report that 70 of them fails. So if anyone use

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-550) InstanciatedIndex - faster but memory consuming index

2006-07-20 Thread Karl Wettin (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-550?page=comments#action_12422359 ] Karl Wettin commented on LUCENE-550: To make this index work flawless (I hope), remove the if-statement around the following row in InstatiatedIndexWriter

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-550) InstanciatedIndex - faster but memory consuming index

2006-07-20 Thread Karl Wettin (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-550?page=comments#action_12422363 ] Karl Wettin commented on LUCENE-550: A comment on memory usage: about 2x a RAMDirectory (900MB and 1800MB) on a 150,000 document corpus (when the corpus term

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-550) InstanciatedIndex - faster but memory consuming index

2006-06-16 Thread Karl Wettin (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-550?page=comments#action_12416583 ] Karl Wettin commented on LUCENE-550: There is a bug with phrase queries. Possible term positions. Low priority for me. InstanciatedIndex - faster but memory consuming

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-550) InstanciatedIndex - faster but memory consuming index

2006-06-14 Thread Karl Wettin (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-550?page=comments#action_12416266 ] Karl Wettin commented on LUCENE-550: If eveything works as it should I doesn't. I keep taking out the victories in advance. I'll try not to in the future. So forget

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-550) InstanciatedIndex - faster but memory consuming index

2006-06-14 Thread Karl Wettin (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-550?page=comments#action_12416271 ] Karl Wettin commented on LUCENE-550: I'll come with a new number soon enough. Right, it was 25% faster. So forget everthing I said about anything. InstanciatedIndex -

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-550) InstanciatedIndex - faster but memory consuming index

2006-05-11 Thread Doug Cutting (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-550?page=comments#action_12379124 ] Doug Cutting commented on LUCENE-550: - This looks very promising. Unfortunately the code you provide makes many incompatible API changes (e.g., turning Term into an

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-550) InstanciatedIndex - faster but memory consuming index

2006-05-11 Thread Karl Wettin (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-550?page=comments#action_12379128 ] Karl Wettin commented on LUCENE-550: Doug Cutting commented on LUCENE-550: This looks very promising. Unfortunately the code you provide makes many incompatible API

Re: [jira] Commented: (LUCENE-550) InstanciatedIndex - faster but memory consuming index

2006-05-11 Thread karl wettin
On Thu, 2006-05-11 at 18:46 +, Karl Wettin (JIRA) wrote: for 2.0, tolk me what tell me what.. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-550) InstanciatedIndex - faster but memory consuming index

2006-04-20 Thread Yonik Seeley (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-550?page=comments#action_12375373 ] Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-550: - Thanks Karl, it's interesting stuff... You might notice that norms are float[] and not byte[]. That is me who refactored it to

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-550) InstanciatedIndex - faster but memory consuming index

2006-04-20 Thread Karl Wettin (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-550?page=comments#action_12375394 ] Karl Wettin commented on LUCENE-550: You might notice that norms are float[] and not byte[]. That is me who refactored it to see if it would do any good. Bit

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-550) InstanciatedIndex - faster but memory consuming index

2006-04-20 Thread Karl Wettin (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-550?page=comments#action_12375453 ] Karl Wettin commented on LUCENE-550: Due to read and write locks, this is how one must use the extention: InstanciatedIndex ii = new InstanciatedIndex(); IndexWriter iw